0
Original Article |

Neural Responses to Affective and Cognitive Theory of Mind in Children With Conduct Problems and Varying Levels of Callous-Unemotional Traits

Catherine L. Sebastian, PhD; Eamon J. P. McCrory, DClinPsych, PhD; Charlotte A. M. Cecil, MSc; Patricia L. Lockwood, BSc; Stéphane A. De Brito, PhD; Nathalie M. G. Fontaine, PhD; Essi Viding, PhD
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(8):814-822. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.2070.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Context  Reduced neural responses to others' distress is hypothesized to play a critical role in conduct problems coupled with callous-unemotional traits, whereas increased neural responses to affective stimuli may accompany conduct problems without callous-unemotional traits. Heterogeneity of affective profiles in conduct problems may account for inconsistent neuroimaging findings in this population.

Objectives  To broaden understanding of neural processing in conduct problems using an affective processing task including an empathy component as well as to explore dimensional contributions of conduct problems symptoms and callous-unemotional traits to variance in affective neural responses.

Design  Case-control study.

Setting  On-campus neuroimaging facility.

Participants  Thirty-one boys with conduct problems (mean age, 14.34 years) and 16 typically developing control subjects (mean age, 13.51 years) matched for age (range, 10-16 years), IQ, socioeconomic status, handedness, and race/ethnicity. Participants were recruited using screening questionnaires in a community-based volunteer sample.

Main Outcome Measures  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of a task contrasting affective and cognitive theory of mind judgments.

Results  Relative to typically developing children, children with conduct problems showed reduced activation in right amygdala and anterior insula for affective vs cognitive theory of mind judgments. Furthermore, in the right amygdala, regression analysis within the conduct-problems group showed suppressor effects between ratings of conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits. Specifically, unique variance associated with conduct problems was positively correlated with amygdala reactivity, whereas unique variance associated with callous-unemotional traits was negatively correlated with amygdala reactivity. These associations were not explained by hyperactivity, depression/anxiety symptoms, or alcohol use ratings.

Conclusions  Childhood conduct problems are associated with amygdala and anterior insula hypoactivity during a complex affective processing task including an empathy component. Suppressor effects between conduct problems and callous-unemotional traits in the amygdala suggest a potential neural substrate for heterogeneity in affective profiles associated with conduct problems.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 1. Group (control vs conduct problems) by condition (affective theory of mind [ToM] or cognitive ToM) interactions in peak voxels in the right amygdala (coordinates 24, −12, −10) (coronal overlays show y coordinates) (A) and the right anterior insula (coordinates 32, 16, 10) (transversal overlays show z coordinates) (B). Error bars are plotted relative to baseline fixation for display and do not allow inference with respect to baseline fixation. Overlays are displayed at P < .005 (whole brain and uncorrected).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 2. Partial regression plots showing unique associations between Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits scores and amygdala response in the peak voxel from the group by condition interaction analysis (coordinates 24, −12, −10) (left) and Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory (CASI)–Conduct Disorder subscale scores and amygdala response (right) in the conduct-problems group (n = 31). P and r values reflect partial correlation coefficients. ToM indicates theory of mind.

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

Correspondence

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment
Voluntary Control of fMRI Measures?
Posted on January 9, 2013
Jeffrey A. Mattes, M.D.
Psychopharmacology Research Association of Princeton
Conflict of Interest: None Declared

The article by Sebastian et al. (1) and similar studies of functional MRI beg a question. Specifically, can “normals” simulate the fMRI changes found in patient groups (in this case, children with conduct problems) either by pretending to be a patient (e.g., trying to act the role of a child with a conduct problem and callus unemotional traits), or can the fMRI findings be simulated using some type of biofeedback in which, for example, normal subjects try to change their amygdala reactivity by purposely changing their emotional and/or cognitive perspective (or anything else). If a normal, using one mechanism or another, can change the f MRI characteristic being measured, this suggests that the purported causal relationship needs to be questioned. It may be that the f MRI finding is a result of the underlying pathology, rather than the cause. Have studies evaluating the ability of “normals” to change fMRI measures, with studies of the mechanism, been done?

1. Sebastian CL, McCrory EJ, Cecil CA, et al. Neural Responses to Affective and Cognitive Theory of Mind in Children With Conduct Problems and Varying Levels of Callous-Unemotional Traits. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012; 69(8):814-822

Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
Jobs