We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Viewpoint |

Beyond Suicide Action Needed to Improve Self-injury Mortality Accounting

Ian R. H. Rockett, PhD, MPH1,2; Nestor D. Kapusta, MD3; Jeffrey H. Coben, MD2,4
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown
2Injury Control Research Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown
3Department for Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
4Schools of Medicine and Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(3):231-232. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.3738.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


National suicide and unintentional poisoning mortality rates have risen dramatically since 2000,1,2 by almost 20% and 140%, respectively. Both rate rises peak among the middle-aged population, not a historically high-risk injury group. Poisoning mortality is increasingly being driven by intoxication from pharmaceuticals, especially opioid analgesics.3 Collectively, these facts present vital challenges for clinical medicine, medicolegal death investigations, public safety, and public health. Concern about substance abuse sensitized us to a dormant issue of nonsuicide self-injury mortality and provokes our proposition that accounting of self-injury mortality must encompass more than suicide and its problematic measurement.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

10 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Gun violence prevention. Lancet 2016;388(10041):233-4.
Gun violence prevention - Authors' reply. Lancet 2016;388(10041):234.