In the 1990s, it is difficult to open a newspaper or watch television and not find someone claiming that magnets promote healing. Rarely do these claims stem from double-blind, peer-reviewed studies, making it difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff. The current fads resemble those at the end of the last century, when many were falsely touting the benefits of direct electrical and weak magnetic stimulation. Yet in the midst of this popular interest in magnetic therapy, a new neuroscience field has developed that uses powerful magnetic fields to alter brain activity—transcranial magnetic stimulation. This review examines the basic principles underlying transcranial magnetic stimulation, and describes how it differs from electrical stimulation or other uses of magnets. Initial studies in this field are critically summarized, particularly as they pertain to the pathophysiology and treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. Transcranial magnetic stimulation is a promising new research and, perhaps, therapeutic tool, but more work remains before it can be fully integrated in psychiatry's diagnostic and therapeutic armamentarium.
Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more
Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features
Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)
Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours
Example of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) application. Ziad Nahas, MD, demonstrates a TMS figure-8 coil applied over the left prefrontal cortex of Ananda Shastri, PhD. Note that the subject is awake and alert, and is wearing earplugs for safety. The electromyography machine in the lower left corner (B) is used to determine the motor threshold for dosing of stimulation intensity. Several TMS devices and coils are pictured: A, Medtronic-Dantec (Copenhagen, Denmark); C, Cadwell (Kennewick, Wash) with water-cooled figure-8 coil; D, Neotonus (Atlanta, Ga); and E, Magstim (Sheffield, England).
Structural imaging may guide transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) placement. A coronal magnetic resonance image of a subject where the location of the TMS coil is indicated above the left hemisphere motor area. The magnetic field produced by the TMS coil when it discharges is shown in black gauss lines drawn on the brain. Combining TMS with structural imaging may allow for exact guidance of TMS coils, as well as understanding where the TMS magnetic fields are distributed in the brain. (Image courtesy of Daryl Bohning, PhD, and colleagues, Medical University of South Carolina Functional Neuroimaging Division, Charleston.)
Combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with functional imaging reveals TMS neurophysiological effects. Four transverse positron emission tomography images from Kimbrell et al.122 The nose is at the top of the image, and the right image side is the left side of the brain. These are statistical difference images from 8 adults who had TMS applied at 1 Hz over the left prefrontal cortex (arrow, D) during one scan, and then sham during another. Prefrontal TMS at 1 Hz reduced regional brain activity (blue) locally and in remote areas such as the insula (C) and orbitofrontal cortex (A and B). Although TMS with current technology only directly effects superficial cortex, remote transsynaptic effects also occur.
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Psychiatry editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 311
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
More Listings atJAMACareerCenter.com >
and access these and other features:
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.