We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Commentary |

Connecting the "Dots" of Brain Dysfunction in Schizophrenia What Does the Picture Look Like?

David L. Braff, MD
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(9):791-793. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.9.791.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


IN THIS issue of the ARCHIVES, Dr Nancy Andreasen1 proposes a "unitary" neural circuit–cognitive dysfunction model for understanding schizophrenia. This commentary will review Andreasen's scholarly article with a focus on (1) the continued search for specific neural circuit abnormalities in schizophrenia and their associated "signature" cognitive deficits; (2) how these neural circuit dysfunctions and cognitive deficits relate to the heterogeneity of schizophrenia disorder(s); and (3) the problem of the testing and falsifiability of the cortico-cerebellar-thalamic-cortical circuit (CCTCC) cognitive dysmetria model and whether any single unitary model is likely to account for the widespread functional and structural deficits of schizophrenia. At the end of the exercise of connecting the "dots" of brain dysfunction, will we end up with one or multiple (potentially overlapping) pictures of abnormal neural circuits in schizophrenia? I believe that the answer is the latter—that no single unitary model of neural circuit–cognitive dysfunction will be validated for this heterogeneous disorder. It is, of course, possible that a unitary view will prevail, and that is why I agree with Andreasen that much more research is needed in this complex area of inquiry.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

19 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Measuring Patients' Experience

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
What are the Results?