0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Article |

The Dopamine D4 Receptor Gene and Moderation of the Association Between Externalizing Behavior and IQ FREE

Colin G. DeYoung, PhD; Jordan B. Peterson, PhD; Jean R. Séguin, PhD; Jose Maria Mejia, MD; Robert O. Pihl, PhD; Joseph H. Beitchman, MD; Umesh Jain, MD, PhD; Richard E. Tremblay, PhD; James L. Kennedy, MD, MSc; Roberta M. Palmour, PhD
[+] Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Psychology (Drs DeYoung and Peterson) and Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and Department of Psychiatry (Drs Beitchman, Jain, and Kennedy), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; Department of Psychiatry (Dr Séguin) and Departments of Pediatrics, Psychology, and Psychiatry (Dr Tremblay), Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec; University of Alberta, Alberta Hospital Edmonton (Dr Mejia); and Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry (Dr Pihl) and Departments of Biology, Psychiatry, and Human Genetics (Dr Palmour), McGill University, Montreal.


Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(12):1410-1416. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.12.1410.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Background  Dopaminergic neurotransmission is implicated in externalizing behavior problems, such as aggression and hyperactivity. Externalizing behavior is known to be negatively associated with cognitive ability. Activation of dopamine D4 receptors appears to inhibit the functioning of the prefrontal cortex, a brain region implicated in cognitive ability. The 7-repeat allele of the dopamine D4 receptor gene produces less efficient receptors, relative to other alleles, and this may alter the effects of dopamine on cognitive function.

Objective  To examine the influence of a polymorphism in the third exon of the dopamine D4 receptor gene on the association between externalizing behavior and IQ.

Design  In 1 community sample and 2 clinical samples, the presence or absence of the 7-repeat allele was examined as a moderator of the association between externalizing behavior and IQ; the strength of this effect across samples was estimated meta-analytically.

Patients  Eighty-seven boys from a longitudinal community study, 48 boys referred clinically for aggression, and 42 adult males diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Main Outcome Measures  IQ scores and observer ratings of externalizing behavior were taken from existing data sets.

Results  Among individuals lacking the 7-repeat allele, externalizing behavior was negatively correlated with IQ (mean r = −0.43; P<.001). Among individuals having at least 1 copy of the 7-repeat allele, externalizing behavior and IQ were uncorrelated (mean r = 0.02; P = .45). The difference between these correlations was significant (z = −2.99; P<.01).

Conclusions  Allelic variation of the dopamine D4 receptor gene appears to be a genetic factor moderating the association between externalizing behavior and cognitive ability. This finding may help to elucidate the adaptive value of the 7-repeat allele.

Figures in this Article

Externalizing behavior refers to a broad category of behaviors involving disinhibition and approach, including aggression, antisocial behavior, hyperactivity, and impulsivity.1,2 Externalizing behavior problems are typically associated with cognitive impairment, and the negative association between externalizing behavior and IQ is particularly well established.37 In attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), this negative association appears to be primarily genetically based.5 The neuromodulator dopamine has been implicated in various forms of externalizing behavior811 and is known to affect cognitive function.12 Localization of the dopamine D4 receptor in the prefrontal cortex1315 and findings that specific blockade of D4 receptors improves some cognitive impairments1618 prompted our investigation of the possibility that allelic variation in the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4) might moderate the negative association between externalizing behavior and IQ.

DRD4 contains a functional polymorphism consisting of a variable number of tandem repeats of a 48–base pair sequence in the third exon of the gene.19 The 7-repeat allele (DRD4-7), which is present in about 20% of the population worldwide but varies widely in frequency geographically,20 has been associated with ADHD,21 novelty seeking,22,23 and alcohol and drug abuse.24,25 However, findings regarding these phenotypic associations with DRD4-7 have not been consistently replicated.2628 The best-established finding to date is the association between DRD4-7 and ADHD.29DRD4-7 is approximately twice as prevalent in ADHD probands and appears to be associated with 25% to 50% of the genetic risk for ADHD.29,30 Inconsistencies in past findings may reflect, in part, a complex relation between DRD4 variation and externalizing behavior problems. A review of recent research on the properties and functions of the dopamine D4 receptor may allow the generation of more sophisticated hypotheses regarding likely phenotypic associations with DRD4-7.

The D4 receptor is heavily expressed in the prefrontal cortex,1315 where it appears to modulate excitatory signaling.16 This suggests that D4 receptors may be involved in the dopaminergic modulation of the cognitive functions of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, which include working memory and have been linked to general cognitive ability and IQ.12,3133 Dopamine has a generally salutary effect on these cognitive functions, but the effect exhibits an inverted U–shaped function, with impairments evident at high, as well as low, levels of dopamine.12 Some of the negative effects of excess dopamine on cognition may be produced by the action of D4 receptors.12 Clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic with a much stronger affinity for D4 than for other dopamine receptors, appears to improve the cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia, a disorder that involves irregularities of dopaminergic transmission.16 In contrast, traditional antipsychotics, which do not preferentially target D4 receptors, do not improve these cognitive symptoms.16 Additionally, selective D4 receptor antagonists appear capable of reversing pharmacologically induced cognitive deficits in monkeys.17,18 Further, it appears that D4 blockade is only effective in producing cognitive benefits when other dopamine receptors are not blocked, suggesting a unique role for D4 among dopamine receptors in inhibiting cognitive processes.16,18

Relative to the 2 other most common DRD4 alleles (2- and 4-repeat) and to the 10-repeat allele, DRD4-7 produces less efficient receptors, with decreased potency for coupling with adenylate cyclase, part of the receptor's second messenger system.34,35DRD4-7 also appears to decrease gene expression, which would further diminish the effects of D4 receptors in the brain.36 Because of these reductions in D4 function and expression, DRD4-7 may act as an endogenous D4 suppressor; carriers of this allele seem likely to exhibit lower levels of the processes associated with D4 receptors. One might expect some similarity, therefore, between the effects of D4 antagonists and the DRD4-7 phenotype. Because D4 antagonists appear to alleviate some cognitive impairments, DRD4-7 could conceivably attenuate negative associations between cognitive ability and behaviors associated with increased dopaminergic activity, such as externalizing behavior.811 (Although dopamine agonists, such as methylphenidate, are used in relatively low doses to reduce externalizing behavior, they appear to produce this effect by decreasing net dopaminergic activity through activation of presynaptic inhibitory autoreceptors.11) Consistent with this possibility, Swanson and colleagues37 found that among children diagnosed with ADHD, those who had DRD4-7 did not show deficits relative to controls on 3 neuropsychological tests of the attentional network involving dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, whereas those who did not have DRD4-7 did show deficits.

We tested the hypothesis that DRD4 variation might moderate the commonly reported negative association between externalizing behavior and IQ,36 using 3 male samples with high mean levels of externalizing behavior. We then employed meta-analysis to obtain an estimate of effect size across all 3 samples.

GENOTYPING

For all 3 samples, DNA was isolated from peripheral leukocytes using standard procedures and genotyped following amplification of the region in the third exon of the DRD4 gene containing the 48–base pair variable number of tandem repeats, using a modification of the methods of Lichter and colleagues.38 The forward and backward primers were D4-3 (5′-GCGACTACGTGGTCTACTCG-3′) and D4-42 (5′-AGGACCCTCATGGCCTTG-3′). The polymerase chain reaction was performed in 25 μL (final volume) of Taq polymerase buffer (50 mmol/L potassium chloride, 10 mmol/L Tris-chloride, pH = 9, 1 mmol/L magnesium chloride, and 1% Triton X-100), containing 10% dimethyl sulfoxide; 200 μm each of deoxyadenosine, deoxycytidine, and deoxythymidine triphosphates; 100 μm deoxycyguanosine triphosphate; 100 μmol/L deaza-deoxyguanosine triphosphate; 500 ng of each primer; and 1 ng of DNA. Conditions for amplification were 40 cycles of 20 seconds at 95°C, 20 seconds at 54°C, and 40 seconds at 72°C, followed by a final extension of 4 minutes at 72°C, using an MJ Research Inc PT-100 thermocycler (Waltham, Mass). Polymerase chain reaction products were analyzed after electrophoresis (10% nondenaturing polyacrylamide or 3.5% agarose) and ethidium bromide staining. Participants were considered DRD4-7 positive if they had at least 1 copy of DRD4-7 and DRD4-7 negative if they did not.

PARTICIPANTS
Sample 1

Genotypes were available for 50 male children who were referred clinically to participate in a study of aggression at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto, Canada. They ranged in age from 5 to 15 years (mean, 9.89 ± 2.53 years). Forty were white (80%), 8 were African American (16%), 1 was East Asian (2%), and 1 was Native American (2%). The Asian and Native American participants were excluded from analysis because of population stratification; DRD4-7 frequencies are very different in East Asian and Native American populations than in white and African American populations.20 Because the frequency of DRD4 alleles is very similar in white and African American populations, inclusion of African Americans does not present a significant risk of population stratification. Nonetheless, we note how our results would have changed if African American participants had been excluded. Twenty-eight boys were DRD4-7 negative (58%) and 20 were DRD4-7 positive (42%). Twelve of these boys were being treated with a psychostimulant (eg, methylphenidate) at the time of assessment, but treatment status was not significantly related to DRD4-7 status (χ21 = 1.87; P = .17).

Sample 2

Genotypes were available for 67 male adults diagnosed with ADHD in adulthood who participated in a study of pharmacological treatments for ADHD at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. Of these, 42 had observer ratings from which an index of externalizing behavior could be calculated. They ranged in age from 18 to 56 years (mean, 35.17 ± 10.22 years). Forty-one (98%) were white and 1 (2%) was African American. Twenty-nine (69%) were DRD4-7 negative and 13 (31%) were DRD4-7 positive. Externalizing behavior and IQ were assessed prior to all pharmacological treatment.

Sample 3

Genotypes were available for 87 boys participating in a longitudinal study of French-speaking white boys who started kindergarten in 1983 in the 53 lowest socioeconomic status schools of the Catholic School Commission of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.39 Genotyping was done at age 17 years, recruiting from a sample of 203 boys who had been selected from the longitudinal cohort, primarily on the basis of teacher ratings of physical aggression at ages 6, 10, 11, and 12 years, to participate in laboratory studies at 15 years.40 Nonaggressive boys had teacher-rated aggression scores below the 70th percentile at all assessment points and constituted 35% of the complete longitudinal sample. Unstable-aggressive boys exceeded the 70th percentile for aggression at 1 or 2 assessment points and constituted 46% of the complete longitudinal sample. Stable-aggressive boys had aggression scores above the 70th percentile at age 6 years and at least twice more from ages 10 to 12 years and constituted 19% of the complete longitudinal sample. In the genotyped sample, 29 boys (33%) were nonaggressive, 29 were unstable aggressive, and 29 were stable aggressive. Fifty-seven boys (66%) were DRD4-7 negative and 30 (34%) were DRD4-7 positive. DRD4-7 status was unrelated to physical aggression category (χ22 = 1.22; P = .53). Six boys were being treated with a psychostimulant at 1 or more assessment points (an additional 6 did not have treatment status reported). Treatment status was unrelated to DRD4-7 status (χ21 = 0.00; P = .95). Not surprisingly, treatment status was significantly linearly related to aggression category; 2 of the 6 boys undergoing treatment were unstable aggressive and 4 were stable aggressive (χ21 = 4.11; P<.05).

BEHAVIORAL AND COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT

Assessments of externalizing behavior and IQ were made using the instruments described in Table 1. Assessments took place at time of entry to the studies, unless otherwise noted. In all cases where multiple assessments of either construct were available, they were standardized and averaged to yield a single score. Full-scale IQ scores in samples 1 and 3 were estimated based on scores from the administered subtests. IQ estimates of this sort typically correlate at approximately r = 0.90 with full-scale IQ, even when based on a single administration; this is a common method for assessing cognitive ability while conserving time and resources.5,48 IQ is highly heritable and stable over time, so minor differences in time of administration relative to assessments of externalizing behavior should not reduce the sensitivity of our analyses.5,49

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Instruments Used to Assess Externalizing Behavior (EB) and IQ

Figure 1 shows the main finding of interest, confirming in all 3 samples our hypothesis that possession of the DRD4-7 allele attenuates the association between externalizing behavior and IQ. Only in the DRD4-7–negative groups was there a significant negative correlation between these 2 variables. Because different instruments and assessment techniques were used in the 3 samples, the Schmidt-Hunter method of meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled effect sizes.50 Correlations between externalizing behavior and IQ were weighted by sample size and combined for each genotype group. The mean n-weighted (population-weighted) r for the DRD4-7–negative group (n = 114) was −0.43 (P<.001), while for the DRD4-7–positive group (n = 63) it was 0.02 (P = .45). These effect sizes differed significantly between the genotype groups (z = −2.99; P<.01). (All P values are 2 tailed, unless noted otherwise.)

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Association between externalizing behavior (standardized within each sample) and IQ in 3 male samples, as a function of dopamine D4 receptor 7-repeat allele (DRD4-7) status. A, Sample 1: aggressive children (n = 48). B, Sample 2: adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (n = 42). C, Sample 3: low economic status community child sample (n = 87). All P values are 2-tailed.

Graphic Jump Location
SAMPLE 1

The mean estimated IQ across both genotype groups was 99.29 (SD = 12.97; range, 70-127). Boys who were being treated with psychostimulants did not differ significantly in IQ or externalizing behavior from those who were not: IQ, t48 = −0.17, P<.86; externalizing behavior, t48 = −0.35, P = .73. The genotype groups did not differ significantly in IQ or externalizing behavior (Table 2), and the correlation between IQ and externalizing behavior when both genotype groups were combined was not significant (r = −0.20; P = .18). If the 8 African American participants were excluded from the primary analysis, the correlation in the DRD4-7–positive group remained the same as that reported in Figure 1A; in the DRD4-7–negative group, it changed only slightly, from −0.38 to −0.34.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Means (SDs) of IQ and Externalizing Behavior as a Function of DRD4-7 Status
SAMPLE 2

The mean full-scale IQ across both genotype groups was 113.48 (SD = 14.00; range, 79-143). The genotype groups did not differ significantly in IQ or externalizing behavior (Table 2). The correlation between IQ and externalizing behavior in the full sample was significant (r = −0.32; P<.05), but weaker than the correlation in the DRD4-7–negative group alone, which is reported in Figure 1B. If the 1 African American participant was excluded, the only change was in the DRD4-7–negative group, in which the correlation rose from −0.44 to −0.45.

SAMPLE 3

The mean estimated IQ across both genotype groups was 101.89 (SD = 12.85; range, 59-126). The 6 physically aggressive boys who were treated with psychostimulants did not differ significantly in IQ from the physically aggressive boys who were not treated (t51 = 1.26; P = .21). The genotype groups differed significantly in IQ but did not differ in externalizing behavior (Table 2). The correlation between IQ and externalizing behavior when both genotype groups were combined was significant (r = −0.34; P<.05) but was weaker than the correlation in the DRD4-7–negative group alone, which is reported in Figure 1C.

The physical aggression, opposition, and hyperactivity scales, which were combined to yield a single externalizing behavior score for sample 3, were also examined separately to determine whether the moderating effect of DRD4-7 was similar for different types of externalizing behavior. All 3 scales showed the same pattern as the composite score: significant negative correlations with IQ in the DRD4-7–negative group (r = −0.42, −0.44, and −0.37, respectively; P<.01) and no correlations with IQ in the DRD4-7–positive group (r = −0.04, 0.04, and −0.09, respectively; P>.60).

To examine more closely the significant difference in IQ between genotypes in this sample, boys were grouped according to the physical aggression categories by which they were originally selected for laboratory studies. (As these categories were based on the stability of aggression longitudinally, they were not applicable in samples 1 and 2.) The regression lines in Figure 1C suggest that the 2 genotype groups are more likely to differ significantly in IQ among boys higher in externalizing behavior, and this hypothesis is supported in Figure 2, which shows mean IQ for each of the 3 aggression categories, broken down by genotype group. An analysis of variance comparing 3 aggression categories with 2 DRD4-7 status categories revealed significant main effects of genotype and aggression category on IQ: genotype, F1 = 5.42, P<.05; aggression category, F2 = 5.06, P<.01. The effect of the interaction between aggression category and DRD4-7 status neared 1-tailed significance: F2 = 2.16, P = .06 (a 1-tailed test is appropriate because we could predict this effect based on the results in Figure 1C). Planned comparisons revealed that the significant difference in IQ between DRD4-7–negative and DRD4-7–positive groups was found only in the stable-aggressive group (Figure 2).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Sample 3. Mean estimated IQ as a function of physical aggression category and dopamine D4 receptor 7-repeat allele (DRD4-7) status. Groups not sharing a superscript differ significantly (P<.05).

Graphic Jump Location

In 3 male samples, the association between externalizing behavior and IQ was moderated by the presence or absence of the DRD4-7 allele. Specifically, the negative association between externalizing behavior and IQ was completely attenuated by DRD4-7. Although the samples were fairly small, they were independent replications, and meta-analysis provided strong evidence that this finding is likely to be robust and reliable. Variation in the DRD4 gene thus appears to differentiate 2 distinct male phenotypes. In males without DRD4-7, externalizing behavior is negatively associated with IQ. In males with DRD4-7, however, there is no association between externalizing behavior and IQ. This effect was evident in both adults and children and it remained similar in magnitude across various types of externalizing behavior, suggesting that it may be related to a common feature of externalizing behaviors, such as increased dopaminergic neurotransmission.811

The attenuation seen in the DRD4-7–positive group seems likely to be the result of the fewer, less efficient D4 receptors produced by the DRD4-7 allele.3436 Decreased D4 receptor function should produce a DRD4-7 phenotype in which the cognitive disruption associated with D4 receptor activation is diminished. Males with the DRD4-7 allele thus appear to be protected from the decrement in cognitive ability associated with externalizing behavior. Further research is necessary to determine whether this finding holds true for measures of cognitive ability other than IQ.

DRD4-7 status does not appear to affect IQ directly, despite the significant difference in IQ between genotype groups in sample 3, but rather to moderate its association with externalizing behavior. Comparisons of the 3 physical aggression groups in sample 3 revealed that significant differences in IQ between DRD4-7–positive and DRD4-7–negative groups emerged only in the most consistently aggressive group (a group that was intentionally overrepresented in this sample, relative to the general population). The pattern of increasing differences in IQ between genotype groups (Figure 2), as severity of physical aggression increases, is paralleled by the increasing gap between the 2 regression lines in Figure 1C as a function of increasing levels of externalizing behavior. Group differences in the strength of association between 2 variables can lead to differences in group means in the extremes of the distributions of those variables. The significant main effect of genotype on IQ in sample 3 seems likely to be an anomaly resulting from the selection process for that sample, rather than a genuine indicator of any direct effect of DRD4 variation on IQ. In keeping with this hypothesis, a study by Ball and colleagues,49 which compared individuals of high IQ with others of average IQ, failed to find any difference in the frequency of DRD4 alleles.

Many theoretical models view intelligence as an important element in behavioral self-regulation, and both low IQ and deficits in working memory have been described as risk factors for externalizing behavior.6,7,51 Researchers interested in antisocial behavior and delinquency have usually argued that low IQ contributes causally to externalizing behavior, rather than the reverse.6 However, the possibility that a causal pathway in the opposite direction (from externalizing behavior to IQ) might be mediated by neurophysiological processes, such as D4 receptor activation, has not previously been considered. In this case, D4 receptor activation resulting from the increased dopaminergic activity associated with externalizing behavior might lead (both immediately and developmentally) to decreased cognitive ability. It is also possible that externalizing behavior and cognitive ability are not directly causally linked, but that they vary together because both are affected by high levels of dopamine resulting from some other genetic or environmental factor. Whatever the causal pathway, our results indicate that it is likely to involve D4 receptors, as the negative association between externalizing behavior and IQ is completely attenuated by the presence of the DRD4-7 allele. The causal possibilities discussed here, therefore, apply only to the DRD4-7–negative group. Externalizing behavior may be associated with dopaminergic activity in both genotype groups, but DRD4-7 appears to prevent this dopaminergic activity from affecting cognitive ability.

Given the meta-analysis by Faraone and colleagues,29 which indicates that DRD4-7 is associated with a minor increase in risk for ADHD, it is important to consider how DRD4-7 could lead both to the decoupling of cognitive ability from externalizing behavior and to increased risk for a disorder that involves externalizing behavior. One possible explanation may be developed based on findings that DRD4-7 is associated with faster reaction times,30,37,52 which might lead to certain specific forms of impulsive or inattentive behavior without an associated impairment of general cognitive ability. The fact that the present study did not show an association between DRD4-7 and externalizing behavior is not incompatible with the evidence for an association of DRD4-7 with ADHD, because we were not testing for association with ADHD specifically. Additionally, our results in sample 2, which was composed entirely of adults diagnosed with ADHD, indicate that DRD4 variation can moderate the association of externalizing behavior and cognitive ability even within an ADHD population.

Recent studies indicating that DRD4-7 is a relatively new allele that has increased in frequency because of positive selection support the argument that DRD4-7 must have some adaptive value.30,53 Our results suggest a novel hypothesis for what that value might be. DRD4-7 appears to produce a phenotype in which cognitive ability is decoupled from behaviors like hyperactivity, impulsivity, and aggression (at least in some male populations). Some environments may favor or even demand such externalizing behaviors, and in these environments, the ability to manifest these behaviors without associated decrement in cognitive ability could be highly advantageous to individuals with DRD4-7, outweighing any associated drawbacks. Externalizing behavior, especially aggression, must have been important in human evolution, given the probability that intraspecies conflict between human groups has constituted a strong selection pressure.54,55 Externalizing behavior may have been particularly advantageous in the unstable or resource-depleted environments that are hypothesized to have driven selection for DRD4-7.30,53 The other DRD4 alleles, in contrast, may be more adaptive in stable environments, in which externalizing behavior is less likely to be advantageous.

Correspondence: Jordan B. Peterson, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G3, Canada (jordanbpeterson@yahoo.com), or Colin G. DeYoung, PhD (cdeyoung@post.harvard.edu).

Accepted for Publication: July 28, 2005.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This work has been supported by grants from the Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec (Drs Tremblay and Palmour); grants from Québec's Conseil Québécois de la Recherche Sociale and Canada's Social Sciences and Human Research Council (Dr Tremblay); grants from the Alva Foundation (Drs Beitchman and Kennedy); and fellowships to Dr Séguin from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research and the National Science and Engineering Research Council.

Acknowledgment: We thank Chawki Benkelfat for helpful discussions and review of a previous version of the manuscript. Drs Tremblay, Kennedy, and Palmour share senior authorship of this work.

Nagin  DTremblay  RE Trajectories of boys' physical aggression, opposition, and hyperactivity on the path to physically violent and nonviolent juvenile delinquency. Child Dev 1999;701181- 1196
PubMed Link to Article
Krueger  RFHicks  BMPatrick  CJCarlson  SRIacono  WGMcGue  M Etiologic connections among substance dependence, antisocial behavior, and personality: modeling the externalizing spectrum. J Abnorm Psychol 2002;111411- 424
PubMed Link to Article
Andersson  HWSommerfelt  K The relationship between cognitive abilities and maternal ratings of externalizing behaviors in preschool children. Scand J Psychol 2001;42437- 444
PubMed Link to Article
Elkins  IJIacono  WGDoyle  AEMcGue  M Characteristics associated with the persistence of antisocial behavior: results from recent longitudinal research. Aggress Violent Behav 1997;2101- 124
Link to Article
Kuntsi  JEley  TCTaylor  AHughes  CAsherson  PCaspi  AMoffitt  TE Co-occurrence of ADHD and low IQ has genetic origins. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2004;12441- 47
PubMed Link to Article
Lynam  DMoffitt  TEStouthamer-Loeber  M Explaining the relation between IQ and delinquency: class, race, test motivation, school failure, or self-control? J Abnorm Psychol 1993;102187- 196
PubMed Link to Article
Séguin  JRNagin  DSAssaad  J-MTremblay  RE Cognitive-neuropsychological function in chronic physical aggression and hyperactivity. J Abnorm Psychol 2004;113603- 613
PubMed Link to Article
Chambers  RAPotenza  MN Neurodevelopment, impulsivity, and adolescent gambling. J Gambl Stud 2003;1953- 84
PubMed Link to Article
Pihl  ROPeterson  JB Alcoholism: the role of different motivational systems. J Psychiatry Neurosci 1995;20372- 396
PubMed
Soderstrom  HBlennow  KManhem  AForsman  A CSF studies in violent offenders, I: 5-HIAA as a negative and HVA as a positive predictor of psychopathy. J Neural Transm 2001;108869- 878
PubMed Link to Article
Solanto  MV Neuropsychopharmacological mechanisms of stimulant drug action in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a review and integration. Behav Brain Res 1998;94127
PubMed Link to Article
Arnsten  AFTRobbins  TW Neurochemical modulation of prefrontal cortical functions in humans and animals. In:Stuss  DTKnight  Reds.Principles of Frontal Lobe Function. New York, NY Oxford University Press2002;
De La Garza  RMadras  BK [(3)H]PNU-101958, a D(4) dopamine receptor probe, accumulates in prefrontal cortex and hippocampus of non-human primate brain. Synapse 2000;37232- 244
PubMed Link to Article
Mrzljak  LBergson  CPappy  MHuff  RLevenson  RGoldman-Rakic  PS Localization of dopamine D4 receptors in GABAergic neurons of the primate brain. Nature 1996;381245- 248
PubMed Link to Article
Primus  RJThurkauf  AXu  JYevich  EMcInerney  SShaw  KTallman  JFGallagher  DW Localization and characterization of dopamine D4 binding sites in rat and human brain by use of the novel, D4 receptor selective ligand [3H]NGD 94-1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997;2821020- 1027
PubMed
Wong  AHVan Tol  HH The dopamine D4 receptors and mechanisms of antipsychotic atypicality. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2003;271091- 1099
PubMed Link to Article
Arnsten  AFTMurphy  BLMerchant  K The selective dopamine D4 receptor antagonist, PNU-101387G, prevents stress-induced cognitive deficits in monkeys. Neuropsychopharmacology 2000;23405- 410
PubMed Link to Article
Jentsch  JDTaylor  JRRedmond  DE  JrElsworth  JDYoungren  KDRoth  RH Dopamine D4 receptor antagonist reversal of subchronic phencyclidine-induced object retrieval/detour deficits in monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1999;14278- 84
PubMed Link to Article
Van Tol  HHWu  CMGuan  HCOhara  KBunzow  JRCivelli  OKennedy  JSeeman  PNiznik  HBJovanovic  V Multiple dopamine D4 receptor variants in the human population. Nature 1992;358149- 152
PubMed Link to Article
Chang  F-MKidd  JRLivak  KJPakstis  AJKidd  KK The world-wide distribution of allele frequencies at the human dopamine D4 receptor locus. Hum Genet 1996;9891- 101
PubMed Link to Article
LaHoste  GJSwanson  JMWigal  SBGlabe  CWigal  TKing  NKennedy  JL Dopamine D4 receptor gene polymorphism is associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Mol Psychiatry 1996;1121- 124
PubMed
Benjamin  JLi  LPatterson  CGreenberg  BDMurphy  DLHamer  DH Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of novelty seeking. Nat Genet 1996;1281- 84
PubMed Link to Article
Ebstein  RPNovick  OUmansky  RPriel  BOsher  YBlaine  DBennett  ERNemanov  LKatz  MBelmaker  RH Dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of novelty seeking. Nat Genet 1996;1278- 80
PubMed Link to Article
George  SRCheng  RNguyen  TIsrael  YO’Dowd  BF Polymorphisms of the D4 dopamine receptor alleles in chronic alcoholism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1993;196107- 114
PubMed Link to Article
Kotler  MCohen  HSegman  RGritsenko  INemanov  LLerer  BKramer  IZer-Zion  MKletz  IEbstein  RP Excess dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III seven repeat allele in opioid-dependent subjects. Mol Psychiatry 1997;2251- 254
PubMed Link to Article
Kluger  ANSiegfried  ZEbstein  RP A meta-analysis of the association between DRD4 polymorphism and novelty seeking. Mol Psychiatry 2002;7712- 717
PubMed Link to Article
Luciano  MZhu  GKirk  KMWhitfield  JBButler  RHeath  ACMadden  PAMartin  NG Effects of dopamine receptor D4 variation on alcohol and tobacco use and on novelty seeking: multivariate linkage and association analysis. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2004;124113- 123
PubMed Link to Article
Paterson  ADSunohara  GAKennedy  JL Dopamine D4 receptor gene: novelty or nonsense? Neuropsychopharmacology 1999;213- 16
PubMed Link to Article
Faraone  SVDoyle  AEMick  EBiederman  J Meta-analysis of the association between the 7-repeat allele of the dopamine D4 receptor gene and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2001;1581052- 1057
PubMed Link to Article
Wang  EDing  Y-CFlodman  PKidd  JRKidd  KKGrady  DLRyder  OASpence  MASwanson  JMMoyzis  RK The genetic architecture of selection at the human dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene locus. Am J Hum Genet 2004;74931- 944
PubMed Link to Article
Duncan  J Attention, intelligence, and the frontal lobes. In:Gazzaniga  MSed.The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, Mass MIT Press1995;
Duncan  JSeitz  RJKolodny  JBor  DHerzog  HAhmed  ANewell  FNEmslie  H A neural basis for general intelligence. Science 2000;289457- 460
PubMed Link to Article
Gray  JRChabris  CFBraver  TS Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nat Neurosci 2003;6316- 322
PubMed Link to Article
Asghari  VSanyal  SBuchwaldt  SPaterson  AJovanovic  VVan Tol  HH Modulation of intracellular cyclic AMP levels by different human dopamine D4 receptor variants. J Neurochem 1995;651157- 1165
PubMed Link to Article
Jovanovic  VGuan  HCVan Tol  HH Comparative pharmacological and functional analysis of the human dopamine D4.2 and D4.10 receptor variants. Pharmacogenetics 1999;9561- 568
PubMed Link to Article
Schoots  OVan Tol  HH The human dopamine receptor repeat sequences modulate expression. Pharmacogenomics J 2003;3343- 348
PubMed Link to Article
Swanson  JOosterlaan  JMurias  MSchuck  SFlodman  PSpence  MAWasdell  MDing  YChi  HCSmith  MMann  MCarlson  CKennedy  JLSergeant  JALeung  PZhang  YPSadeh  AChen  CWhalen  CKBabb  KAMoyzis  RPosner  MI Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder children with a 7-repeat allele of the dopamine receptor D4 gene have extreme behavior but normal performance on critical neuropsychological tests of attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;974754- 4759
PubMed Link to Article
Lichter  JBBarr  CLKennedy  JLVan Tol  HHMKidd  KKLivak  KJ A hypervariable segment in the human dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene. Hum Mol Genet 1993;2767- 773
PubMed Link to Article
Tremblay  REPihl  ROVitaro  FDobkin  PL Predicting early onset of male antisocial behavior from preschool behavior. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51732- 739
PubMed Link to Article
Séguin  JRPihl  ROHarden  PWTremblay  REBoulerice  B Cognitive and neuropsychological characteristics of physically aggressive boys. J Abnorm Psychol 1995;104614- 624
PubMed Link to Article
Achenbach  TM Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 6 to 18.  Burlington, VT University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families2001;
Harris  GTRice  MEQuinsey  VL Psychopathy as a taxon: evidence that psychopaths are a discrete class. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994;62387- 397
PubMed Link to Article
Wechsler  D Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. 3rd Toronto, Can Psychological Corp1991;
Wechsler  D The Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence–Revised.  San Antonio, Tex Psychological Corp1989;
Wechsler  D Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. 3rd Toronto, Can Psychological Corp1997;
Wechsler  D Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Revised.  San Antonio, Tex Psychological Corp1974;
Séguin  JRBoulerice  BHarden  PTremblay  REPihl  RO Executive functions and physical aggression after controlling for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, general memory, and IQ. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1999;401197- 1208
PubMed Link to Article
Sattler  JM Assessment of Children: WISC-III and WPPSI-R Supplement.  San Diego, Calif Author1992;
Ball  DHill  LEley  TCChorney  MJChorney  KThompson  LADetterman  DKBenbow  CLubinski  DOwen  MMcGuffin  PPlomin  R Dopamine markers and general cognitive ability. Neuroreport 1998;9347- 349
PubMed Link to Article
Hunter  JESchmidt  FLJackson  GB Meta-analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies.  Beverly Hills, Calif Sage1982;
Sergeant  JAGeurts  HOosterlaan  J How specific is a deficit of executive functioning for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? Behav Brain Res 2002;1303- 28
PubMed Link to Article
Langley  KMarshall  Lvan den Bree  MThomas  HOwen  MO'Donovan  MThapar  A Association of the dopamine D4 receptor gene 7-repeat allele with neuropsychological test performance of children with ADHD. Am J Psychiatry 2004;161133- 138
PubMed Link to Article
Ding  Y-CChi  H-CGrady  DLMorishima  AKidd  JRKidd  KKFlodman  PSpence  MASchuck  SSwanson  JMZhang  YPMoyzis  RK Evidence of positive receptor selection acting at the human dopamine receptor D4 gene locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99309- 314
PubMed Link to Article
Alexander  RD Evolution of the human psyche. In:Mellars  PStringer  Ceds.The Human Revolution. Edinburgh, Scotland Edinburgh University Press1989;
Diamond  J The Third Chimpanzee: The Evolution and Future of the Human Animal.  New York, NY Harper-Collins1992;

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Association between externalizing behavior (standardized within each sample) and IQ in 3 male samples, as a function of dopamine D4 receptor 7-repeat allele (DRD4-7) status. A, Sample 1: aggressive children (n = 48). B, Sample 2: adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (n = 42). C, Sample 3: low economic status community child sample (n = 87). All P values are 2-tailed.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Sample 3. Mean estimated IQ as a function of physical aggression category and dopamine D4 receptor 7-repeat allele (DRD4-7) status. Groups not sharing a superscript differ significantly (P<.05).

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Instruments Used to Assess Externalizing Behavior (EB) and IQ
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Means (SDs) of IQ and Externalizing Behavior as a Function of DRD4-7 Status

References

Nagin  DTremblay  RE Trajectories of boys' physical aggression, opposition, and hyperactivity on the path to physically violent and nonviolent juvenile delinquency. Child Dev 1999;701181- 1196
PubMed Link to Article
Krueger  RFHicks  BMPatrick  CJCarlson  SRIacono  WGMcGue  M Etiologic connections among substance dependence, antisocial behavior, and personality: modeling the externalizing spectrum. J Abnorm Psychol 2002;111411- 424
PubMed Link to Article
Andersson  HWSommerfelt  K The relationship between cognitive abilities and maternal ratings of externalizing behaviors in preschool children. Scand J Psychol 2001;42437- 444
PubMed Link to Article
Elkins  IJIacono  WGDoyle  AEMcGue  M Characteristics associated with the persistence of antisocial behavior: results from recent longitudinal research. Aggress Violent Behav 1997;2101- 124
Link to Article
Kuntsi  JEley  TCTaylor  AHughes  CAsherson  PCaspi  AMoffitt  TE Co-occurrence of ADHD and low IQ has genetic origins. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2004;12441- 47
PubMed Link to Article
Lynam  DMoffitt  TEStouthamer-Loeber  M Explaining the relation between IQ and delinquency: class, race, test motivation, school failure, or self-control? J Abnorm Psychol 1993;102187- 196
PubMed Link to Article
Séguin  JRNagin  DSAssaad  J-MTremblay  RE Cognitive-neuropsychological function in chronic physical aggression and hyperactivity. J Abnorm Psychol 2004;113603- 613
PubMed Link to Article
Chambers  RAPotenza  MN Neurodevelopment, impulsivity, and adolescent gambling. J Gambl Stud 2003;1953- 84
PubMed Link to Article
Pihl  ROPeterson  JB Alcoholism: the role of different motivational systems. J Psychiatry Neurosci 1995;20372- 396
PubMed
Soderstrom  HBlennow  KManhem  AForsman  A CSF studies in violent offenders, I: 5-HIAA as a negative and HVA as a positive predictor of psychopathy. J Neural Transm 2001;108869- 878
PubMed Link to Article
Solanto  MV Neuropsychopharmacological mechanisms of stimulant drug action in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a review and integration. Behav Brain Res 1998;94127
PubMed Link to Article
Arnsten  AFTRobbins  TW Neurochemical modulation of prefrontal cortical functions in humans and animals. In:Stuss  DTKnight  Reds.Principles of Frontal Lobe Function. New York, NY Oxford University Press2002;
De La Garza  RMadras  BK [(3)H]PNU-101958, a D(4) dopamine receptor probe, accumulates in prefrontal cortex and hippocampus of non-human primate brain. Synapse 2000;37232- 244
PubMed Link to Article
Mrzljak  LBergson  CPappy  MHuff  RLevenson  RGoldman-Rakic  PS Localization of dopamine D4 receptors in GABAergic neurons of the primate brain. Nature 1996;381245- 248
PubMed Link to Article
Primus  RJThurkauf  AXu  JYevich  EMcInerney  SShaw  KTallman  JFGallagher  DW Localization and characterization of dopamine D4 binding sites in rat and human brain by use of the novel, D4 receptor selective ligand [3H]NGD 94-1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997;2821020- 1027
PubMed
Wong  AHVan Tol  HH The dopamine D4 receptors and mechanisms of antipsychotic atypicality. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2003;271091- 1099
PubMed Link to Article
Arnsten  AFTMurphy  BLMerchant  K The selective dopamine D4 receptor antagonist, PNU-101387G, prevents stress-induced cognitive deficits in monkeys. Neuropsychopharmacology 2000;23405- 410
PubMed Link to Article
Jentsch  JDTaylor  JRRedmond  DE  JrElsworth  JDYoungren  KDRoth  RH Dopamine D4 receptor antagonist reversal of subchronic phencyclidine-induced object retrieval/detour deficits in monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1999;14278- 84
PubMed Link to Article
Van Tol  HHWu  CMGuan  HCOhara  KBunzow  JRCivelli  OKennedy  JSeeman  PNiznik  HBJovanovic  V Multiple dopamine D4 receptor variants in the human population. Nature 1992;358149- 152
PubMed Link to Article
Chang  F-MKidd  JRLivak  KJPakstis  AJKidd  KK The world-wide distribution of allele frequencies at the human dopamine D4 receptor locus. Hum Genet 1996;9891- 101
PubMed Link to Article
LaHoste  GJSwanson  JMWigal  SBGlabe  CWigal  TKing  NKennedy  JL Dopamine D4 receptor gene polymorphism is associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Mol Psychiatry 1996;1121- 124
PubMed
Benjamin  JLi  LPatterson  CGreenberg  BDMurphy  DLHamer  DH Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of novelty seeking. Nat Genet 1996;1281- 84
PubMed Link to Article
Ebstein  RPNovick  OUmansky  RPriel  BOsher  YBlaine  DBennett  ERNemanov  LKatz  MBelmaker  RH Dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of novelty seeking. Nat Genet 1996;1278- 80
PubMed Link to Article
George  SRCheng  RNguyen  TIsrael  YO’Dowd  BF Polymorphisms of the D4 dopamine receptor alleles in chronic alcoholism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1993;196107- 114
PubMed Link to Article
Kotler  MCohen  HSegman  RGritsenko  INemanov  LLerer  BKramer  IZer-Zion  MKletz  IEbstein  RP Excess dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III seven repeat allele in opioid-dependent subjects. Mol Psychiatry 1997;2251- 254
PubMed Link to Article
Kluger  ANSiegfried  ZEbstein  RP A meta-analysis of the association between DRD4 polymorphism and novelty seeking. Mol Psychiatry 2002;7712- 717
PubMed Link to Article
Luciano  MZhu  GKirk  KMWhitfield  JBButler  RHeath  ACMadden  PAMartin  NG Effects of dopamine receptor D4 variation on alcohol and tobacco use and on novelty seeking: multivariate linkage and association analysis. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2004;124113- 123
PubMed Link to Article
Paterson  ADSunohara  GAKennedy  JL Dopamine D4 receptor gene: novelty or nonsense? Neuropsychopharmacology 1999;213- 16
PubMed Link to Article
Faraone  SVDoyle  AEMick  EBiederman  J Meta-analysis of the association between the 7-repeat allele of the dopamine D4 receptor gene and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2001;1581052- 1057
PubMed Link to Article
Wang  EDing  Y-CFlodman  PKidd  JRKidd  KKGrady  DLRyder  OASpence  MASwanson  JMMoyzis  RK The genetic architecture of selection at the human dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene locus. Am J Hum Genet 2004;74931- 944
PubMed Link to Article
Duncan  J Attention, intelligence, and the frontal lobes. In:Gazzaniga  MSed.The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, Mass MIT Press1995;
Duncan  JSeitz  RJKolodny  JBor  DHerzog  HAhmed  ANewell  FNEmslie  H A neural basis for general intelligence. Science 2000;289457- 460
PubMed Link to Article
Gray  JRChabris  CFBraver  TS Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nat Neurosci 2003;6316- 322
PubMed Link to Article
Asghari  VSanyal  SBuchwaldt  SPaterson  AJovanovic  VVan Tol  HH Modulation of intracellular cyclic AMP levels by different human dopamine D4 receptor variants. J Neurochem 1995;651157- 1165
PubMed Link to Article
Jovanovic  VGuan  HCVan Tol  HH Comparative pharmacological and functional analysis of the human dopamine D4.2 and D4.10 receptor variants. Pharmacogenetics 1999;9561- 568
PubMed Link to Article
Schoots  OVan Tol  HH The human dopamine receptor repeat sequences modulate expression. Pharmacogenomics J 2003;3343- 348
PubMed Link to Article
Swanson  JOosterlaan  JMurias  MSchuck  SFlodman  PSpence  MAWasdell  MDing  YChi  HCSmith  MMann  MCarlson  CKennedy  JLSergeant  JALeung  PZhang  YPSadeh  AChen  CWhalen  CKBabb  KAMoyzis  RPosner  MI Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder children with a 7-repeat allele of the dopamine receptor D4 gene have extreme behavior but normal performance on critical neuropsychological tests of attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;974754- 4759
PubMed Link to Article
Lichter  JBBarr  CLKennedy  JLVan Tol  HHMKidd  KKLivak  KJ A hypervariable segment in the human dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene. Hum Mol Genet 1993;2767- 773
PubMed Link to Article
Tremblay  REPihl  ROVitaro  FDobkin  PL Predicting early onset of male antisocial behavior from preschool behavior. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51732- 739
PubMed Link to Article
Séguin  JRPihl  ROHarden  PWTremblay  REBoulerice  B Cognitive and neuropsychological characteristics of physically aggressive boys. J Abnorm Psychol 1995;104614- 624
PubMed Link to Article
Achenbach  TM Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 6 to 18.  Burlington, VT University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families2001;
Harris  GTRice  MEQuinsey  VL Psychopathy as a taxon: evidence that psychopaths are a discrete class. J Consult Clin Psychol 1994;62387- 397
PubMed Link to Article
Wechsler  D Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. 3rd Toronto, Can Psychological Corp1991;
Wechsler  D The Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence–Revised.  San Antonio, Tex Psychological Corp1989;
Wechsler  D Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. 3rd Toronto, Can Psychological Corp1997;
Wechsler  D Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Revised.  San Antonio, Tex Psychological Corp1974;
Séguin  JRBoulerice  BHarden  PTremblay  REPihl  RO Executive functions and physical aggression after controlling for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, general memory, and IQ. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1999;401197- 1208
PubMed Link to Article
Sattler  JM Assessment of Children: WISC-III and WPPSI-R Supplement.  San Diego, Calif Author1992;
Ball  DHill  LEley  TCChorney  MJChorney  KThompson  LADetterman  DKBenbow  CLubinski  DOwen  MMcGuffin  PPlomin  R Dopamine markers and general cognitive ability. Neuroreport 1998;9347- 349
PubMed Link to Article
Hunter  JESchmidt  FLJackson  GB Meta-analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies.  Beverly Hills, Calif Sage1982;
Sergeant  JAGeurts  HOosterlaan  J How specific is a deficit of executive functioning for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder? Behav Brain Res 2002;1303- 28
PubMed Link to Article
Langley  KMarshall  Lvan den Bree  MThomas  HOwen  MO'Donovan  MThapar  A Association of the dopamine D4 receptor gene 7-repeat allele with neuropsychological test performance of children with ADHD. Am J Psychiatry 2004;161133- 138
PubMed Link to Article
Ding  Y-CChi  H-CGrady  DLMorishima  AKidd  JRKidd  KKFlodman  PSpence  MASchuck  SSwanson  JMZhang  YPMoyzis  RK Evidence of positive receptor selection acting at the human dopamine receptor D4 gene locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99309- 314
PubMed Link to Article
Alexander  RD Evolution of the human psyche. In:Mellars  PStringer  Ceds.The Human Revolution. Edinburgh, Scotland Edinburgh University Press1989;
Diamond  J The Third Chimpanzee: The Evolution and Future of the Human Animal.  New York, NY Harper-Collins1992;

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 32

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles