We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Commentary |

N- methyl-D-aspartate Glutamate Receptor Antagonists and the Promise of Rapid-Acting Antidepressants

John H. Krystal, MD
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(11):1110-1111. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.138.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The exciting findings reported by Diazgranados and her collagues1 regarding the antidepressant efficacy of the uncompetitive N- methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptor antagonist ketamine in depressed patients with bipolar disorder add to the emerging interest in rapid-acting antidepressants (RAAs).

Their article describes robust, clinically relevant, and rapid alleviation of depression symptoms in patients with bipolar disorder that persists far beyond the presence of the drug in the body. Ketamine has a terminal half-life of approximately 3 hours. Yet after 2 days, or 16 half-lives, of ketamine, the effect size of its antidepressant effects was large (0.8). Impressively, at 2 weeks there were still traces of the antidepressant effects of single ketamine dose, associated with an effect size of 0.22. Further, 6 of 17 patients had a clinical response to ketamine within 40 minutes of infusion and 9 of 16 patients experienced a remission of their depression during the study. The magnitude of these ketamine effects was particularly impressive because the changes were observed in patients who had treatment-resistant symptoms and who were already receiving mood-stabilizing medications. These data suggest that the benefits of ketamine in patients with bipolar disorder mirror those reported earlier for patients with unipolar depression.24

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

21 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Evidence to Support the Update

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Evidence Summary and Review 2