We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

Medusa's Head and Ancient Aristotelian Biology

Hutan Ashrafian, PhD, MRCS1; Francesco M. Galassi, MD1; Leanne Harling, PhD, MRCS1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, England
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(6):625. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.3225.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor Harris1 in this journal presented a far-reaching piece regarding The Head of Medusa (circa 1618) by Peter Paul Rubens. It might also be apposite to add that the origins for the painting and the original Greek myth of Medusa’s head may have derived from a hitherto unconnected interpretation of ancient Greek biology. The myth of the Gorgon Medusa included the cutting of its head with reptilian extensions to result in further heads being regenerated. This may have derived from an allegorical interpretation of the ancient Greek awareness of cut reptilian tails having the ability to regenerate. Evidence of this biological familiarity can be derived from Aristotle’s History of Animals (fourth century BC), where he describes: “The tails of lizards and serpents, if they be cut-off will grow again.”2,3 The distinction that serpents do not have the regenerative abilities of lizards was not clear in the ancient world, so that the reptilian Medusa legend would have fitted with the comprehension of the natural world at that time. Interestingly, however, Rubens and his collaborator Frans Snyders may have been exposed to a similar interpretation, as their painting of the Medusa’s head comprises both serpents and lizards.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.