Low Salivary Cortisol and Persistent Aggression in Boys Referred for Disruptive Behavior FREE

CONDUCT disorder (CD)^1- 2 refers to a pattern of antisocial behavior in childhood or adolescence that lasts at least 6 months but which in some cases becomes a lifelong personality style. Two types³ are operationally distinguished by whether the first symptom appears before or after age 10 years. In many cases, adolescent-onset CD is confined to a stage of dalliance with delinquent behavior (often with the encouragement or coparticipation of peers) and remits with continued socialization and maturation.^4- 6 The more severe childhood-onset CD is typically marked by more aggressiveness, more severely disturbed peer relations, and a lengthier course than seen with adolescent-onset CD.⁷ Childhood-onset CD is notoriously difficult to treat. Children who exhibit this pattern often sustain severely antisocial behavior into the fourth or fifth decade of life, along the way accounting for a hugely disproportionate percentage of total crimes committed and acts of victimization on others.

As yet, persistent aggressive CD cannot be reliably identified except in retrospect, and the mechanisms underlying this pattern of behavior remain poorly understood. Biobehavioral studies often find this pattern to be associated with abnormal baseline levels of psychophysiological measures or abnormal reactivity to experimental stressors.^8- 9 One measure that responds to certain stressors is the concentration of cortisol in the saliva, which reflects activity in the malleable hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and mirrors the level of free (unbound) cortisol in the blood that can engage brain receptors.¹⁰ We have found that boys with CD with comorbid anxiety (who are probably highly reactive to stress) have very high concentrations of cortisol, whereas boys with CD whose behavior is unconstrained by comorbid anxiety have low concentrations of cortisol in the saliva, are more aggressive, and are more often rejected by their peers.^11- 13 Boys with CD and low cortisol concentrations were found to exhibit aggression at younger ages¹⁴ than boys with CD and cortisol concentrations in the upper ranges. We report a follow-up of the subjects from those original studies that further establishes an inverse association between cortisol and aggression, and that suggests that boys with persistently low salivary cortisol concentrations have a markedly elevated risk of continuing in aggressive antisocial behavior.

Subjects came from one site (University of Georgia, Athens) of a longitudinal study (the Developmental Trends Study^7,15) of CD in males. Boys were referred for problem behavior. Of 80 Georgia Developmental Trends Study participants, 38 completed an auxiliary study¹⁶ by providing saliva samples in years 2 and 4 of the study. (Some eligible boys did not participate because they were unavailable, were residing far from the University of Georgia, or participated in the Developmental Trends Study before final institutional review board approval for the auxiliary study was secured.) The mean (SD) age at entry for subjects in this subsample was 9.75 (1.7) years (age range, 7-12 years); mean (SD) full-scale IQ score, 103 (16.9) (score range, 69-151). Subjects' socioeconomic status ranged across all 5 Hollingshead¹⁷ social status categories but was overrepresented in the lower 2 categories. Sixteen percent of subjects were African American. The remaining 84% were non-Hispanic white. Parents provided informed consent and boys provided oral assent to study participation.

Two methods of assessing aggression over time were used. The first measure was the total aggressive CD symptoms from the 4 annual child psychodiagnostic evaluations. Symptoms of childhood disorders described in DSM-III-R¹ were determined from structured interviews (The NIMH Diagnostic Schedule for Children, Version 2¹⁸) of children, parents (all mothers), and teachers. Independent diagnosticians (clinical psychology graduate trainees) observed 25% of the interviews through 1-way mirrors. Interrater agreement (κ) exceeded 0.65 for each CD symptom. Aggressive CD symptoms included (1) threatens or intimidates others, (2) often initiates physical fights, (3) has used a weapon, (4) has been physically cruel to people, (5) has been physically cruel to animals, (6) has stolen while confronting a victim, and (7) has forced someone into sexual activity, plus the symptom of bullies described in DSM-IV.² Other symptoms were summed to measure covert (nonaggressive) CD (has set fires; has destroyed property; has broken into someone else's house, building, or car; tells lies; has stolen; stays out late; has run away from home overnight; and is truant from school) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). We used the unweighted sum of symptoms (after calculating that the first principal component from factor analyses of symptoms did not aggregate the variance in the aggression construct any more efficiently than simple unit weighting).

The second measure of aggression was peer nomination counts from sociometric exercises conducted during years 1 and 2 of the Developmental Trends Study. All children in a subject's classroom named the 3 children they thought best fit each of 5 categories: (1) likes most, (2) likes least, (3) fights most, (4) meanest, and (5) most shy. Nominations from the categories of "fights most" and "meanest" were summed across both years of the study to measure peer aggression.

A single saliva sample was gathered from each child during the clinic visit in years 2 and 4 of the study. Samples were stored at −80°C until all samples for the year were collected, at which time they were centrifuged and assayed (procedures detailed elsewhere^12,14) using a commercially available competitive radioimmunoassay kit (Coat-a-Count; Diagnostic Products Corp, Los Angeles, Calif). As seen in Table 1, the time of day of saliva collection could not be controlled and was allowed to vary across the day. However, as found in another study,¹⁹ the time of collection did not affect the relationship between cortisol concentrations and the dependent measures. Similarly, subject age played no significant role in any of the models, either as predictors or as confounders. (Terms for these potential confounds were tested and discarded from the statistical models.)

Because limitations on sample size and measurement intervals precluded formal longitudinal analyses, the primary outcomes were cumulative measures of psychopathology (by symptom and peer nomination counts), each analyzed separately. The primary explanatory variable was salivary cortisol concentrations (originally in micrograms per deciliter) transformed to the natural logarithm scale to render the distributions more symmetric, and presented here as the average log(cortisol) value from years 2 and 4 of our study. Similar results (not shown) were obtained using log(cortisol) values from each year as independent predictors in the model. Relationships among variables were initially assessed using plots and graphical smoothing techniques.²⁰ With count data, we expect right-skewed distributions and for the variance to grow with the mean. To account for these 2 features, responses were analyzed using log-linear (Poisson distribution) regression models with overdispersion,²¹ for example: log (mean aggression) = β0 + β1 × mean log(cortisol). Diagnostic plots of the fitted models (Q-Q-plots and plots of standardized residuals vs the fitted linear predictor portion of the models) visually confirmed that the assumed functional forms for the mean and variance adequately reflected those in the data and fully accounted for heteroscedasticity and skewness. Models were compared via F tests for the observed change in deviance using a computer program (S-plus; MathSoft Inc, Seattle, Wash). All tests of hypotheses were 2-tailed with a significance level of α = .05. Secondary tests were conducted to determine whether cortisol concentrations were more directly related to aggressive CD, covert CD, or hyperactivity.

The correlates of persistently low cortisol concentrations were examined by grouping the subjects by cortisol concentration range. Cortisol concentrations measured at years 2 and 4 of the study were dichotomized at the medians. Subjects were assigned to 1 of 3 cortisol groups: (1) persistently low, cortisol concentrations below the median in both years (n = 12); (2) variable, cortisol concentrations above the median in 1 year and below in the other (n = 15); or (3) persistently high, cortisol concentrations above the median in both years (n = 11). The groups did not differ significantly in age (mean ages: persistently low, 9.7 years; variable, 9.9 years; persistently high, 9.6 years); full-scale IQ (mean scores: persistently low, 96; variable, 109; persistently high, 104); socioeconomic status; or ethnicity.

The mean (SD) log(cortisol) values for years 2 and 4 of the study were –3.48 (0.75). The mean log(cortisol) value in year 4 of the study was marginally higher than in year 2 (paired t test, t₃₇ = 1.8, P = .07). The correlation of log(cortisol) values in study years 2 and 4 was 0.20, and the regression of year 4 log(cortisol) values on year 2 log(cortisol) values was not statistically significant (t₃₆ = 1.23, P = .23). Squaring the correlation (0.2 × 0.2) yields an R² value of 0.04 (ie, 4% of year 4 variance is explained by year 2), indicating considerable within-subject variability over time. This suggests that the average of the 2 measures provides a more valid assessment of subjects' true underlying cortisol tuning and of the relationship between subjects' true log(cortisol) concentrations and the observed psychopathologic traits.

All distributions of psychopathologic traits were skewed right except ODD symptoms. Figure 1 shows that salivary cortisol concentrations are strongly and inversely related to aggressive CD, peer aggression nominations, and ODD and also related (less clearly) to covert CD. The concordance between fits by smooth curves and the log-linear regression model confirms that this model is of appropriate functional form. The change in log(mean behavioral counts) per SD unit increase in mean log(cortisol) value is stated above each plot. Inverting these values provides a relative rate of symptoms for a 1-SD decrease in log(cortisol). For example, a decrease of 1 SD in log(cortisol) corresponds to an increase in the mean number of aggressive CD symptoms by a factor of (1/0.47) = 2.13 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-2.84). The estimated effect for peer aggression is virtually identical. A decrease of 1 SD in the average log(cortisol) value corresponds to a 1.44-fold increase in covert CD symptoms (95% CI, 0.98-2.13) and a 1.28-fold increase in ODD symptoms (95% CI, 1.14-1.45). The use of log(cortisol) values for study years 2 and 4 as separate effects, rather than as averages, never significantly improved the model fit (F tests for separate vs averaged log[cortisol] values for the 4 responses: F_1,34 = 0.0096, P = .92; F_1,30 = 0.204, P = .65; F_1,34 = 0.433, P = .52; and F_1,34 = 2.34, P = .13). Relationships were flexibly adjusted for the time of cortisol collection, and no difference in the cortisol-psychopathology relationship was found (F tests for the time of collection as predictors of the 4 responses: F_4,31 = 1.112, P = .37; F_4,27 = 1.002, P = .42; F_4,31 = 0.438, P = .78; and F_4,31 = 0.740, P = .57).

After adjustment for the linear and quadratic effects of log(covert CD + 1), the association of the mean log(cortisol) value to aggressive CD was −0.55 and still significant (z = −3.61, P<.001). The converse mediational model—prediction of covert CD from the average log(cortisol) value after adjusting for log(aggressive CD + 1)—was not significant. This suggests that much of the apparent association between cortisol and covert CD is mediated by aggressive CD.

After adjustment by a flexible quadratic function of log(hyperactivity + 1), the effect of the average log(cortisol) value on aggressive CD was −0.49 and still significant (z = −3.63, P<.001). In the converse mediational model (prediction of hyperactivity while covarying linear and curvilinear log functions of aggressive CD), the covariates were significant predictors, but the term for cortisol was not (estimate = −0.04). These analyses imply that the apparent relationship between hyperactivity and cortisol is mediated almost entirely by aggressive CD, whereas a large amount of the covariance of aggressive CD and cortisol is independent of hyperactivity.

The variable and persistently high cortisol groups did not differ on aggressive CD symptoms, peer aggression nominations, covert CD, or ODD symptoms (Figure 2). The persistently low cortisol group (Table 2) was significantly worse than the remainder of the sample on all 4 of these variables, incurring roughly 3 times as many aggression counts (5.2 vs 1.5 aggressive CD symptoms, 33.5 vs 10.5 peer aggression nominations, 6 vs 2 covert CD symptoms, and 28.6 vs 16.8 ODD symptoms).

In DSM-IV,² the criterion that distinguishes childhood-onset CD from adolescent-onset CD is whether the first CD symptom emerged before the age of 10 years. Boys who met this criterion (n = 23) compared with those who did not (n = 15) had lower total cortisol concentrations (standardized log[cortisol] value of −0.33 vs 0.51, F = 7.6, P = .009).

Boys whose cortisol concentrations were above the median range in at least 1 study year were roughly evenly distributed between early emergence of the first symptom (n = 12) and late emergence (n = 14). However, all but 1 of the subjects in the persistently low cortisol group (n = 11, 92%) developed the first CD symptom by age 10 years. The cross-tabulation was significant (2-tailed Fisher exact test, P = .012).

The relationship of low cortisol to early emergence of the first symptom was examined separately for aggressive vs covert CD symptoms in log-linear models. The average log(cortisol) value was related to the age of emergence of the first aggressive CD symptom (estimate = 0.15, z = 2.62, P<.009). Exponentiation suggests that every SD increase in the log(cortisol) value is associated with a 16% increase in mean age of onset. Following adjustment for log-linear and log-quadratic effects of covert CD, salivary cortisol concentrations remained a significant predictor of aggressive CD symptom emergence (estimate = 0.12, z = 2.09, P = .037). Cortisol concentrations failed to significantly predict the age of the first covert CD symptom, regardless of whether the age of emergence for the first aggressive CD symptom was included. These analyses imply that differences in cortisol concentration between DSM-IV² types of CD occur chiefly because low cortisol concentrations are directly associated with early emergence of aggression.

We found that salivary cortisol concentrations sampled over time were inversely associated with several measures of aggression and disruptive behavior collected roughly over the same interval. Cortisol concentration was directly linked to aggression and indirectly to covert CD and hyperactivity via comorbidities of these syndromes with aggression. The age at which the first aggressive symptoms appeared was positively associated with cortisol concentration. Boys with early emergence (by age 10 years) of the first CD symptom had lower cortisol concentrations than those with late emergence.

Some earlier studies,^22- 24 including one that focused on aggression,²⁵ produced dissimilar results. However, accrual of other direct and indirect evidence linking life-course-persistent aggression to low cortisol concentrations attests that the current findings are not isolated. A retrospective study²⁶ of adults found that aggressive antisocial prisoners and prisoners with childhood histories of undersocialized aggressive CD (the comparable version of early-onset CD in DSM-III²⁷) have lower cortisol concentrations than other prisoners and normal volunteers. A study²⁸ with adolescents found an inverse relationship of salivary cortisol concentrations to the number of early personality CD symptoms and to paternal history of lifelong CD and/or antisocial personality disorder. Children with early-onset ODD (a frequent antecedent of CD) were reported to have lower cortisol concentrations than normal controls.²⁹ A preliminary study (K.M., unpublished data, 1999) with a small sample size found that boys with childhood-onset CD as described in DSM-IV² have significantly lower salivary cortisol concentrations than boys with adolescent-onset CD and clinic controls. Finally, a study³⁰ of children with comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and ODD and/or CD found that those individuals whose attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnosis persisted over time had lower cortisol concentrations at rest and in response to stress. Together, this literature and the current findings suggest that the features most linked to low cortisol concentrations are childhood-onset CD, persistence through adulthood, and prominent aggressiveness. Some evidence also points to familial patterns and the absence of comorbid anxiety. The personality features of psychopathy were not evaluated in this study, but this outcome should be examined in future research.

The mechanism linking persistent aggression and low cortisol concentrations is not known. Animal models have shown that prenatal and early developmental stress can cause long-lasting or even permanent alteration of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis³¹ by affecting steroid receptors situated in the hippocampus and frontal cortex.³² It may be of interest in future studies to examine whether certain lifestyle correlates of antisocial families (eg, maternal use of tobacco or exposure to other teratogens during pregnancy; incompetent and/or inadequate parenting; chaotic, unpredictable social environment; and abuse, threats, or deprivations^33- 34) might be associated with dysregulation of children's hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

Several methodological limitations should be acknowledged. The sample was relatively small and consisted only of males. The collection of saliva to measure cortisol levels was limited to 2 samples without controlling for time of day, and the concentrations were affected by substantial extraneous variability. The design and analyses were not truly longitudinal, ie, the key variables were not measured methodically at the outset so that temporal relationships could be specified.

Accepted for publication September 17, 1999.

This study was supported in part by research grants K-02 MH01066 (Dr McBurnett) and MH42529 (Dr Loeber) from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

Reprints: Keith McBurnett, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 3077, Chicago, IL 60637 (e-mail: kmcburne@yoda.bsd.uchicago.edu).