0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
News and Views |

Does Lithium Treatment Still Work?  Evidence of Stable Responses Over Three Decades

Ross J. Baldessarini, MD; Leonardo Tondo, MD
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(2):187-190. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.57.2.187.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

To evaluate whether lithium treatment has been overvalued and may be no longer as effective as formerly, we reviewed published reports on long-term lithium treatment (1970-1996) as well as analyzing its clinical effects on 360 patients with DSM-IV bipolar disorder who entered into lithium maintenance monotherapy after 1970. Neither reported recurrence rates nor average proportions of time ill nor patient improvement of 50% or more during lithium maintenance therapy in a stable clinic setting has changed significantly since the 1970s. Unfavorable results in some settings may reflect accumulation over time of patients with complex, less treatment-responsive illnesses. Lithium is unmatched in research support for long-term clinical effectiveness against morbidity and mortality associated with depression or mania in bipolar I and II disorders. Data evaluated herein did not support suggestions that benefits of lithium have been exaggerated in the past or have been lost recently.

Figures in this Article

Topics

lithium

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Recurrence rates (percentage of subjects per month) for studies found in the literature1538 vs year of reported treatment with lithium. Recurrence rates fell over the years (r = −0.445; P = .03), even when a small early study18 with an aberrantly high value was excluded (r = −0.474; P = .02).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Percentage of improvement in morbidity (as mean ± SEM episodes per year or percentage of time ill) in 360 Sardinian patients with bipolar I and II disorders during lithium maintenance treatment compared with themselves between illness onset and the start of maintenance treatment, between 1970 and 1996. There was no significant change in either measure of clinical benefit of lithium treatment (r = 0.023 and r = 0.007 for individual cases vs individual years of starting treatment, for episode frequency and percentage of time ill, respectively; for both, P≥.80).

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 101

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();