We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters to the Editor |

Use of Suprathreshold Electroconvulsive Therapy

Michael Alan Taylor, MD
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58(6):607. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.58.6.607.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The 2 special articles in the May 2000 issue of the ARCHIVES regarding suprathreshold electroconvulsive therapy (ECT)%1,2 raise several concerns. First, because no standard ECT machine now available to practicing clinicians (as opposed to researchers) can deliver the energy needed for suprathreshold treatment of most patients, the relative efficacy of unilateral suprathreshold ECT vs bilateral ECT is moot. Second, because these studies did not include the most severely ill depressed patients, we cannot know the generalizability of these studies. Furthermore, because ECT compared with medications is most cost-effective for treatment of the severely depressed, and because the typical practice in treating patients with mild to moderate depression is with medications rather than ECT, the patients in these 2 studies who will benefit from suprathreshold unilateral ECT will not get it. Lastly, I fear the "take-home message" to most clinicians implied by the commentary%3 accompanying the articles will be this: unilateral ECT is now proven equal to bilateral ECT and with fewer cognitive problems; therefore, it is better. Clinicians will use unilateral ECT at the highest energy permitted by their machine for their most severely ill depressed patients, and no one will know if that process will benefit anyone.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.