0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters to the Editor |

Hope for Sustaining a Positive 3-Year Therapeutic Relationship With Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder

Brin F. S. Grenyer, PhD
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(5):609. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.5.609-a.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

The recent article by Giesen-Bloo and colleagues1 comparing schema-focused and transference-focused psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder is remarkable on 2 accounts. First, it gives hope to psychotherapists that sustaining a positive clinical relationship with patients with borderline personality disorder over 3 years of twice-weekly therapy is both possible and worthwhile. Second, it is one of the very few studies that show differential effectiveness between 2 therapy types, given that research from the past 30 years has consistently failed to find differential effects between treatment types.2 In contrast, research has shown that the therapeutic alliance,3 therapist effectiveness,4 and researcher allegiance5 powerfully relate to clinical changes. In this context, it is surprising that Giesen-Bloo and colleagues do not address these issues in their article. Such data might help readers to understand their findings, including the puzzling but large difference in dropout rates between treatments, and understand the allegiance-boosting effect that allowing patient-therapist contact between therapy sessions might have had in the schema-focused group.

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 2

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();