We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Symbol Formation: An Organismic-Development Approach to Language and the Expression of Thought.

E. Mansell Pattison, MD
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1964;11(1):99-100. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1964.01720250101013.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The study of language has fluctuated in emphasis between form and function. Advocates of form analysis, the older linguistic tradition, have held that meaning is determined primarily by words and syntax. Whereas advocates of function analysis, pyscholinguistics, contend that meaning is determined by the implications of the language. At issue is the means of language development, the nature of the symbols employed in language, and the relationship between speech and thought.

Werner and Kaplan present a theory of language development which contains a synthesis of language form and function, and report a body of systematic research, largely from the Clark University projects on human development and symbolic activities. However, the research data is primarily employed to illustrate the theoretical constructions of the authors.

The authors consider man as unique in possessing a basic desire to know his world, rather than merely reacting with or reacting to his world (p


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.