0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Paradoxical Influence of a Therapeutic Side-Effect Interpretation

RONALD S. LIPMAN, PhD; LEE C. PARK, MD; KARL RICKELS, MD
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1966;15(5):462. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1966.01730170014004.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

THE CLINICAL literature is replete with references to the importance of nonpharmacological factors which may influence the response of patients to pharmacotherapy. An excellent review of these "nonspecific" factors is provided in two recent articles by Honigfeld.1,2 In the main, however, there have been relatively few studies3-7 which have experimentally manipulated nonpharmacological variables thought to affect therapeutic outcome.

Since a number of studies have suggested that the psychological "meaning" of side-effects to the patient may reliably influence his clinical course, the present research has focused on evaluating the impact of two different side-effect interpretations on the clinical response of anxious neurotic outpatients. In this connection investigations by Kast,8,9 by Kast and Loesch,10,11 and by Rickels et al,12 are particularly relevant. In studies with patients characterized by an anxiety and gas-trointestinal somatization,11 hypertropic arthritis,9 and functional digestive disorders without organic pathology;10 Kast and Loesch used atropine sulfate (0.6 mg, t.i.d.)

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();