We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Psychotherapy and Morality: A Study of Two Concepts.

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1967;17(1):119-120. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1967.01730250122018.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


This book renders a special kind of service to the psychotherapeutic enterprise. One of its chief virtues lies in the clarity with which it reveals how psychotherapeutic models are embedded in the moral substructure of society and culture. The author, an analytical philosopher, makes his contribution through a logical analysis of the language and practice of professional psychotherapists (primarily the dynamic school broadly conceived), some of whom he knew while he was a senior research associate in the Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati.

His focal interest is to bring the practice and theory of psychotherapy into the arena of the philosophical framework of evaluation. His twofold sensitivity to the psychotherapists' resistance to philosophic "intrusion" and to the theoreticians' pervasive blindness to the value of philosophical principles spur him to note that, when professionals reflect upon their activity, they tend toward philosophical generalization themselves (and thereby become "amateurs," as Waelder1 has so succinctly pointed out). The philosopher offers the function of a Socratic midwife: to clarify the latent philosophical assumptions and moral values within which the professional psychotherapist works by virtue of his relationship to the larger society and culture in which he functions.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.