0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 107.22.120.91. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Article |

Personal Differences in Perceptual Deprivation

John Marks, PhD; Warren Garlington, PhD; Victor Ganzer, PhD; L. Glenn Collins, MS; David R. Johnson
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1968;19(2):146-154. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1968.01740080018004.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

A PERSON cut off from meaningful sensory stimulation is literally on his own. What significance he puts into his experience comes largely from him. Perceptual or sensory deprivation can be, in Goldberger's phrase, a walk-in inkblot. Reactions vary from something very like psychosis to pleasant enjoyment. It has been suggested that deprivation, like the hallucinogens, offers an experimental analogue of psychosis. As with the LSD experience much depends upon the atmosphere in which the experiment takes place. But under standard conditions almost every worker has found substantial variation in how his individual subjects react. Would deprivation be a useful tool in individual assessment? Does it measure the individual's potential for psychosis? Does the variability of individual reactions shed any light upon the theoretical explanations of the effects of deprivation? Lindsley1 links the effects of deprivation to the need of the reticular activating

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
/>
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();