0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Evaluation of Alcoholism Treatment:  A Comparison of Three Facilities

E. Mansell Pattison, MD; Ronald Coe, BS; Robert J. Rhodes, PhD
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1969;20(4):478-488. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1969.01740160094013.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

THIS PAPER is part of a series of studies aimed at clarifying treatment methods for alcoholics and the methods of assessing such treatment. Pattison1 has pointed out that much of the traditional pessimism regarding the treatment of alcoholism may be unjustified. When treatment is given in indiscriminate fashion to a random group of alcoholics in the hope that "something will take," or if only one treatment method is used for all alcoholics in the belief that it is "the" way to treat alcoholics, the results often have been poor. On the other hand, when treatment is carefully planned and selected for the particular needs of a specified alcoholic population the results often have been highly consistent and encouraging.

In their recent book-length review of planning treatment programs for alcoholics, Blum and Blum2 underscore the need for multiple programs that can provide a broad range of treatments based on

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();