Article |

A Pilot Swedish Twin Study of Affective Illness, Including Hospital- and Population-Ascertained Subsamples

Kenneth S. Kendler, MD; Nancy Pedersen, PhD; Lars Johnson, MD; Michael C. Neale, PhD; Aleksander A. Mathé, MD, PhD
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50(9):699-706. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820210033004.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective:  We sought to compare the probandwise concordance rate (PRC) for affective illness (AI) in monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins in samples ascertained through psychiatric hospitalization vs samples from the general population.

Methods:  Twins were ascertained through psychiatric hospitalization for AI from the Swedish Psychiatric Twin Registry or as a matched sample from the population-based Swedish Twin Registry. Lifetime diagnoses were based on a mailed questionnaire containing, in self-report format, DSM-III-R criteria for mania and major depression. Returned questionnaires were obtained from 1484 individuals and both members of 486 pairs, of whom 154 were classified as MZ, 326 as DZ, and six of unknown zygosity.

Results:  No evidence was found for violations of the equal environment assumption. Using either a narrow or broad diagnostic approach, the risk for AI in cotwins of proband twins was independent of the gender, polarity (ie, unipolar vs bipolar) and mode of ascertainment of the affected proband (ie, via hospitalization vs from the general population). Combining both subsamples, PRC for total AI using narrow diagnostic criteria was 48.2% in MZ and 23.4% in DZ twins. Using broad diagnostic criteria, the parallel figures were 69.7% and 34.9%. The risk for bipolar illness was substantially increased in the cotwins of probands with bipolar AI.



Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.