0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Article |

Cigarette Smoking Saturates Brain α4β2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors FREE

Arthur L. Brody, MD; Mark A. Mandelkern, MD, PhD; Edythe D. London, PhD; Richard E. Olmstead, PhD; Judah Farahi, PhD; David Scheibal, BS; Jennifer Jou, BS; Valerie Allen, BS; Emmanuelle Tiongson, BS; Svetlana I. Chefer, PhD; Andrei O. Koren, PhD; Alexey G. Mukhin, MD, PhD
[+] Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences (Drs Brody and London, Mr Scheibal, and Mss Jou, Allen, and Tiongson), University of California, Los Angeles; Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System Positron Emission Tomography Center (Drs Brody, Mandelkern, London, Olmstead, and Farahi, Mr Scheibal, and Mss Jou, Allen, and Tiongson), Los Angeles; Department of Physics, University of California, Irvine (Dr Mandelkern); Intramural Research Program, Neuroimaging Research Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, Md (Drs Chefer and Mukhin); and Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders, New Haven, Conn (Dr Koren).


Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(8):907-914. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.907.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Context  2-[18F]fluoro-3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy) pyridine (2-F-A-85380, abbreviated as 2-FA) is a recently developed radioligand that allows for visualization of brain α4β2* nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) with positron emission tomography (PET) scanning in humans.

Objective  To determine the effect of cigarette smoking on α4β2* nAChR occupancy in tobacco-dependent smokers.

Design  Fourteen 2-FA PET scanning sessions were performed. During the PET scanning sessions, subjects smoked 1 of 5 amounts (none, 1 puff, 3 puffs, 1 full cigarette, or to satiety [2½ to 3 cigarettes]).

Setting  Academic brain imaging center.

Participants  Eleven tobacco-dependent smokers (paid volunteers).

Main Outcome Measure  Dose-dependent effect of smoking on occupancy of α4β2* nAChRs, as measured with 2-FA and PET in nAChR-rich brain regions.

Results  Smoking 0.13 (1 to 2 puffs) of a cigarette resulted in 50% occupancy of α4β2* nAChRs for 3.1 hours after smoking. Smoking a full cigarette (or more) resulted in more than 88% receptor occupancy and was accompanied by a reduction in cigarette craving. A venous plasma nicotine concentration of 0.87 ng/mL (roughly 1/25th of the level achieved in typical daily smokers) was associated with 50% occupancy of α4β2* nAChRs.

Conclusions  Cigarette smoking in amounts used by typical daily smokers leads to nearly complete occupancy of α4β2* nAChRs, indicating that tobacco-dependent smokers maintain α4β2* nAChR saturation throughout the day. Because prolonged binding of nicotine to α4β2* nAChRs is associated with desensitization of these receptors, the extent of receptor occupancy found herein suggests that smoking may lead to withdrawal alleviation by maintaining nAChRs in the desensitized state.

Figures in this Article

Tobacco dependence (primarily through cigarette smoking) is a major risk factor for death and disability worldwide.1,2 This condition is relatively resistant to treatment, as evidenced by the fact that most smokers endorse a desire to quit3 but very few are able to do so on their own4 and fewer than half are able to quit long-term even with comprehensive treatment.3,5 A greater understanding of the mechanisms that underlie tobacco dependence may aid in the development of improved treatments for this condition.

Of the thousands of components of tobacco smoke, nicotine is the one that is most closely linked to tobacco dependence.6 Nicotine administration provides positive reinforcement7,8 and ameliorates a range of behavioral states that accompany smoking abstinence, including irritability,9 anxiety,9 and deficits in cognitive performance.1012 Extensive animal research demonstrates that the interaction of nicotine with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs)13 (along with associated actions of nicotine) activates dopamine pathways projecting to the nucleus accumbens,1419 leading to positive reinforcement.8,20

The nAChR containing α4 and β2 subunits (α4β2* subtype) is the predominant receptor subtype in the mammalian brain, and the α421 and β22225 subunits have been linked to the positive-reinforcing (and cognitive function–enhancing) effects of nicotine. Nicotine has high affinity for α4β2* receptors, and therefore, these receptors are considered as primary targets for the actions of nicotine during cigarette smoking. Studies with engineered mutant mice suggest that α4β2* nAChRs are necessary and sufficient to exhibit in vivo effects of smoking, such as tolerance and sensitization.21

The affinity of nicotine for the α4β2* nAChR measured in vitro is in the range of 0.5 to 14 nmol,26 which is equal to a concentration of 0.01 to 2.3 ng/mL. Typical human smokers have venous plasma nicotine concentrations of 10 to 50 ng/mL during the day.27 Based on these reports, we hypothesized that human cigarette smoking results in nearly complete saturation of α4β2* nAChRs.

2-[18F]fluoro-3-(2(S)azetidinylmethoxy) pyridine (2-F-A-85380, abbreviated as 2-FA) is a radiotracer recently developed for the in vivo imaging of α4β2* nAChRs with positron emission tomography (PET).2830 Positron emission tomography studies in nonhuman primates demonstrate that receptor binding of 2-FA31 (and another PET radiotracer for α4β2* nAChRs32) can be decreased by administration of nicotine or inhalation of tobacco smoke. Recent studies have demonstrated the safety of this radiotracer for use in humans.30,3335 Using 2-FA and PET, we sought to determine the effect of cigarette smoking on brain α4β2* nAChR occupancy in tobacco-dependent smokers.

SUBJECTS

Eleven tobacco-dependent smokers (≥20 cigarettes per day), who were recruited through advertisements in local newspapers and the Internet, participated in the study. Eight subjects were scanned only once in an experimental (smoking) condition, while 3 subjects underwent 2 scanning sessions, 1 in an experimental (smoking) condition and 1 in a control (no smoking) condition, as described later, so that a total of 14 PET scanning sessions were performed for this study. Subjects met DSM-IV criteria for nicotine dependence but were otherwise healthy.

Initial screening consisted of an anonymous telephone interview in which medical, psychiatric, and substance abuse histories were obtained. Qualified subjects were then assessed in person using screening questions from the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV36 2 days prior to PET scanning. The central inclusion criterion was the DSM-IV diagnosis of nicotine dependence, while any history of an Axis I psychiatric or substance abuse/dependence diagnosis other than nicotine dependence was exclusionary. Other exclusion criteria were pregnancy and current use of medications or any history of a medical condition that might affect the central nervous system at the time of scanning (eg, current treatment with a β-blocker or analgesic medication or history of head trauma with loss of consciousness or epilepsy). Women of childbearing potential had a urine pregnancy test. Subjects who occasionally used alcohol, caffeine, or other drugs, but did not meet criteria for abuse or dependence, were allowed to participate in the study but were instructed to abstain for the 2 days prior to PET scanning. Subjects who drank more than the equivalent of 2 cups of coffee per day (300 mg of caffeine per day) were also excluded, as were subjects who experienced caffeine withdrawal symptoms (such as irritability, flushing, or headache) temporally associated with caffeine ingestion. After complete description of the study to subjects, written informed consent was obtained using forms approved by the local institutional review board.

During the initial visit, additional screening data were obtained, including the smoker's profile form (which includes smoking history data, such as current smoking level, years smoked, brand of cigarette smoked, and quit periods) and scores on the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence,37,38 the Beck Depression Inventory,39 the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory,40 and the Shiffman-Jarvik Withdrawal Scale.41 An exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) level was obtained using the MicroSmokerlyzer (Bedfont Scientific Ltd, Kent, England) at the initial visit to verify smoking status (subjects were considered to be active smokers if a CO level of ≥8 ppm was obtained).

GENERAL STUDY DESIGN

Participants underwent the following sequence of procedures (described in greater detail later): abstinence from cigarettes and nicotine-containing products for 2 days, a bolus-plus–continuous infusion 2-FA PET scanning session including smoking between 0 and 3.5 cigarettes, blood sampling for plasma nicotine levels and withdrawal symptom monitoring during the PET scanning session, and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain within 1 week of PET scanning to aid in localization of regions of interest on PET scans.

ABSTINENCE PERIOD

After the initial screening, participants were instructed to begin smoking/nicotine abstinence at 6 PM 2 nights prior to PET scanning. They reported to our laboratory at 1 PM the day after initiating abstinence. At that time, an exhaled CO level was measured and a brief clinical interview was performed. Participants were deemed to be compliant with study protocol if they reported no smoking since 6 PM the previous night and had an exhaled CO measurement of 8 ppm or less. Subjects were then seen the following day for PET scanning and were required to report continuous abstinence since 2 nights previously and have an exhaled CO level of 3 ppm or less to undergo PET scanning.

PET PROTOCOL

At noon on the day of PET scanning, subjects arrived at the Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System PET Center, and abstinence was verified as described earlier. Each participant then had an intravenous catheter placed at 12:45 PM in a room adjacent to the PET scanner. At 1 PM, bolus-plus–continuous infusion 2-FA was initiated. In this study, the amount of 2-FA administered as a bolus was equal to the amount infused over 500 minutes (Kbolus = 500 minutes).42,43 Consistent with this paradigm, 144 MBq (mean ± SD, 3.88 ± 0.16 mCi) of 2-FA was administered as an intravenous bolus, followed by continuous infusion of 138 MBq (mean ± SD, 3.72 ± 0.15 mCi) in 57.6 mL of saline over the next 480 minutes (7.2 mL per hour) for a total effective dose of radioactivity of 187.5 MBq (mean ± SD, 5.08 ± 0.21 mCi). All PET scans were obtained as series of 10-minute frames.

Three PET scanning sessions were performed without smoking, as control sessions. For 2 of these sessions, subjects were positioned in the scanner before administration of 2-FA, and PET scanning began at the time of bolus injection and continued for 8 hours with 7 scheduled breaks and no smoking to demonstrate the full time-activity curves for the 2-FA method used herein (Figure 1). For the third session, a subject preferred not to be scanned for the full 8 hours and was scanned without smoking, using the shorter (5 hours) scanning protocol as in the experimental sessions described next.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Time-activity curves (mean ± SEM) for the 2 subjects undergoing full (8 hours) scanning with no smoking. The graphs demonstrate that 3 to 4 hours from the beginning of radioligand infusion are needed to reach a near steady state in the primary regions of interest for the bolus/infusion paradigm used herein. The average increase in radioactivity starting 3.5 hours after initiation of 2-[18F]fluoro-3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy) pyridine (2-F-A-85380) administration was 3.2%, 3.2%, and 2.6% per hour for the thalamus, brainstem, and cerebellum, respectively.

Graphic Jump Location

For the 11 experimental sessions with smoking, subjects received the bolus injection of 2-FA in a room adjacent to the PET scanner. They then remained seated in this room for the next 3 hours to allow the radiotracer to reach a relatively steady state. At 4 PM, brain scanning commenced and continued for 60 minutes. At 5 PM (4 hours after the initiation of 2-FA administration), subjects had a 10-minute break in scanning, during which they smoked between 0 and 3 cigarettes of their favorite brand (because we were interested in studying α4β2* nAChR occupancy from typical smoking conditions). All subjects smoked regular (not light) cigarettes with similar nicotine yields (range, 1.2-1.4 mg).44 The 5 smoking levels for this study were no smoking (n = 3); a single puff, which included only lighting a cigarette and inhaling (measured as roughly one twelfth of a cigarette) (n = 2); 3 puffs of a cigarette (measured as approximately one quarter of a cigarette) (n = 3); a full cigarette (n = 3); and satiety (2½ -3 cigarettes) (n = 3). Subjects were then scanned for 3 hours 50 minutes more with 3 scheduled 10- or 15-minute breaks. Scanning ended at 9 PM.

Blood samples (5 mL) for assay of venous plasma nicotine levels were drawn immediately before and at 10 and 185 minutes following the smoke break from a dual port in the intravenous catheter placed for 2-FA infusion. Two subjects who smoked a full cigarette had a full series of venous plasma nicotine levels drawn prior to the smoke break and at 2, 10, 30, 65, and 185 minutes after the smoke break. Samples were centrifuged, and concentrations of venous plasma nicotine were determined in the laboratory of Peyton Jacob III, PhD, at the University of California, San Francisco, by gas chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detection,45 using 5-methylnicotine as an internal standard. The lower limit of quantitation was 1 ng/mL.

Cigarette craving was monitored with the Urge to Smoke Scale,46,47 an analog scale (range, 0-6) with 10 craving-related questions. This scale was filled out at the beginning of the first break in scanning (prior to smoking), at the end of the first break (after smoking), and during each of the 3 remaining breaks in scanning.

The PET scans were obtained on a General Electric Advance NXi scanner (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis) with 35 slices in 3-dimensional mode, transaxial resolution full width at half maximum 5.2 to 7.7 mm.48 Scans were acquired as series of 10-minute frames. Attenuation correction scanning was performed with the germanium rotating rod source built into the General Electric scanner for 5 minutes at the end of the scanning session, and this attenuation correction was applied to all scans from the session. F 18 was prepared with the CP-45 variable proton energy negative ion cyclotron (The Cyclotron Corporation) and 2-FA was prepared by a published method.49 Specific activities ranged from 122 to 241 GBq/μmol (range, 3.3-6.5 Ci/μmol).

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING

An MRI of the brain was obtained within a week of PET scanning to aid in localization of brain regions on the PET scans, with the following specifications: 3-dimensional Fourier-transform spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition with repetition time = 30 milliseconds, echo time = 7 milliseconds, 30° angle, 2 acquisitions, and 256 × 192 view matrix. The acquired volume was reconstructed as roughly 90 contiguous 1.5-mm-thick transaxial sections.

REGION OF INTEREST PLACEMENT

Magnetic resonance imaging to PET coregistration was performed using an automated image registration method.50 Regions of interest were drawn on MRI and transferred to coregistered PET scans. Regions of interest included the thalamus, brainstem, cerebellum, prefrontal cortex, and corpus callosum. The thalamus, brainstem, and cerebellum were analyzed as whole structures while representative sections of the prefrontal cortex (middle frontal gyrus parallel to the body of cingulate) and genu of the corpus callosum (on sagittal images) were drawn. These brain regions were chosen based on prior reports indicating a range of nAChR densities in these regions from highest (thalamus) to lowest (corpus callosum).5154 Mean ± SD volumes for the thalamus, brainstem, and cerebellum were 4.97 ± 0.22, 18.37 ± 3.41, and 95.71 ± 13.77 cm3, respectively. The expected ratio of specific to nonspecific binding for the thalamus based on a study of nonhuman primates using 2-FA PET was roughly 2:1.29

DERIVATIONS OF RECEPTOR OCCUPANCY PARAMETERS

The total concentration of tissue radioactivity (CT) without smoking can be expressed as follows: CT = CSB + CF + CNB, where CSB is the concentration of specifically bound radioligand, CF is the concentration of free radioligand, and CNB is the concentration of nonspecifically bound radioligand. After smoking, C"T = C"SB + CF + CNB. In subjects who smoked, C"SB<CSB because nicotine, its metabolites, or perhaps other components of tobacco smoke displace some of the specifically bound radiotracer.

At equilibrium conditions and assuming that CF and CNB are unchanged as a result of smoking, the fractional displacement (FD) of radiotracer can be expressed as the following:

where

is the fraction of the tissue radioactivity (before smoking) that represents specifically bound radioligand and is therefore the maximum fraction of radiotracer that can be displaced.

At a tracer dose of radioligand (CSB<Bmax), where Bmax is the receptor concentration, we can derive the following equation from equation 1 (again assuming equilibrium):

where

[Ni] and [Ach] are the tissue concentrations of nicotine and acetylcholine, respectively, and K[Ni] and K[ACh] are the equilibrium dissociation constants for nicotine and acetylcholine, respectively.

The tissue nicotine concentration is assumed to be directly proportional to the amount of cigarette smoked and to the venous plasma nicotine concentration. Therefore, equation 3 can be expressed as:

where ED50 and [D] are in units of cigarettes smoked (or fractions thereof) and EC50 (plasma) (simply called EC50 in the rest of this article) and plasma nicotine concentration [Ni] are in units of nanograms per milliliter or nanomole (nM).

Maximum fractional displacement (R) is also related to the commonly used parameter binding potential (BP*), which is defined as the ratio of VDSB to VDNDR,55 where VDSB and VDNDR are the volumes of distribution for the specific binding and nondisplaceable radioactivity compartments, respectively. Consistent with equation 3, R is defined by the equation:

and BP* can be determined from R, using the equation:

DATA ANALYSIS

For all drawn regions of interest, displacement of radiotracer was found from before to after smoking (even in the lowest nAChR density region, the corpus callosum). This observation limited using the reference region approach for calculations of specific binding. In addition, this evaluation revealed that the highest levels of specific binding were in the thalamus, brainstem, and cerebellum, so that these regions were used for analysis herein, and each of the 3 regions was analyzed independently. For calculation of the dose-dependent effects of smoking on receptor occupancy, we calculated fractional displacement of total radioactivity for each subject and each smoking condition.

CT and C"T values were determined by averaging data from the six 10-minute frames (1 hour) prior to the smoking break (180-240 minutes [mean, 3.5 hours] after bolus injection) and from the last seven 10-minute frames of the PET scanning session (395-480 minutes, including a 15-minute break, [mean, 7.3 hours] after bolus injection) (Figure 2 and Figure 3).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Time-activity curves for the 5 smoking levels for the primary regions of interest. A, Thalamus. B, Brainstem. C, Cerebellum. Radioactivity is expressed as percentage of baseline value (mean radioactivity for the hour before the smoking break ± standard errors of the mean between subjects). 1 indicates 0 cigarettes; 2 indicates 1 puff; 3 indicates 3 puffs; 4 indicates 1 full cigarette; and 5 indicates satiety (2.8 cigarettes). Dotted lines indicate the time of the smoking break. D, Displacement of radioactivity in the whole brain and regions of interest in a subject who smoked to satiety (2.5 cigarettes) during the break (mean ± SE in volume of interest).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.

2-[18F]fluoro-3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy) pyridine (2-F-A-85380) positron emission tomography (PET) images before (top row) and 3.1 hours after (bottom row) cigarette smoking. Images were obtained by averaging the six 10-minute frames over the 1 hour prior to the smoking break and by averaging the seven 10-minute scans from a mean of 3.1 hours after smoking the cigarette amount listed. The far right column shows a magnetic resonance image (MRI) of the brain and a PET image of nondisplaceable radioactivity distribution (calculated). All PET images were aligned to the level shown on the MRI.

Graphic Jump Location

The displacement of total radioactivity (CT minus C"T) for each cigarette dose or venous plasma nicotine level was expressed as a percentage of CT and plotted as a function of amount of cigarette smoked (Figure 4A) or venous plasma nicotine concentration. In these plots, the asymptotic portion of the curve represents the maximum fractional displacement of radioactivity. The plotted data were fitted to equations 5 and 6 mentioned earlier, using nonlinear regression with SigmaStat software (Systat Software, Inc, Richmond, Calif) to determine ED50 (percentage of a cigarette needed to displace 50% of the radiotracer), EC50 (venous plasma nicotine concentration that was associated with 50% radiotracer displacement), and R (maximum fractional displacement). Percentage of receptor occupancy was also calculated by dividing the fractional displacement (as determined in equation 1) by R.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 4.

Effects of variable smoking (number of cigarettes) and venous plasma nicotine levels on radiotracer displacement. A, Percentage of displacement of total radioactivity (Ct) in regions of interest for the range of smoking levels from 0 to 2.8 cigarettes, based on the ratio of displaced Ct by each cigarette dose to prebreak Ct, without correction for the imperfect steady state of the radiotracer found in control scans. B and C, Displacement of specific binding (SB) (a measure that takes into account nondisplaceable radioactivity derived from the asymptotic portion of the saturation curve in part A) by the varying smoking levels without and with correction for the imperfect steady state, respectively. D, Specific binding displacement as a function of venous plasma nicotine levels, corrected.

Graphic Jump Location

We performed these calculations for the raw CT value data and for data corrected for the imperfect steady state found in the no-smoking (control) scans (see “Results” section, paragraphs 2 and 4). The BP* values were calculated based on the R value for each region using equation 8.

Subjects were adults (mean ± SD age, 36.6 ± 11.8 years; 8 men, 3 women) who smoked 22.2 ± 2.8 (mean ± SD) regular cigarettes per day and had been smoking for a mean ± SD of 17.5 ± 10.5 years. Six subjects were African American, 4 subjects were white, and 1 subject was Asian American. One participant's longest previous quit period was 2 years, while the others had longest quit periods ranging from a few days to 1 year. Mean ± SD total scores for the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (5.9 ± 2.2) and the Beck Depression Inventory (3.1 ± 2.5) and mean ± SD per item scores for the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Index (1.8 ± 0.5) and the Shiffman-Jarvik Withdrawal Scale (4.2 ± 0.7) indicated that subjects were moderately dependent on tobacco and had low levels of depression and anxiety during the study. At the time of screening, subjects had exhaled CO levels consistent with tobacco dependence (mean ± SD, 18.1 ± 5.7 ppm), while at the time of scanning, subjects had low exhaled CO levels (mean ± SD, 1.9 ± 1.0 ppm), consistent with their compliance with the abstinence protocol of the study. For all subjects, venous plasma nicotine levels were lower than the level of detection of the laboratory for this study (<1 ng/mL) prior to the smoking break in scanning and were the highest in the first sample after smoking, with a half-life of 145 minutes.

Time-activity curves for the control (no-smoking) scans (Figure 1 and Figure 2A-C) demonstrate that the distribution of radioligand reached a near equilibrium state 3.5 hours after initiation of 2-FA administration, with tissue concentrations maintained in a near steady state for the remainder of the scanning sessions. The percentage change per hour in the no-smoking group was calculated by determining the difference in average radioactivity for each region of interest between the period at which 2-FA reached an approximate steady state (180-240 minutes after infusion initiation) and the final 70 minutes of scanning (395-480 minutes after infusion initiation, including a 15-minute break) and dividing by the number of hours (3.8) between the midpoint of these 2 periods. This calculation resulted in average increases in radioactivity for the thalamus, brainstem, and cerebellum of 12%, 12%, and 10%, respectively (3.2%, 3.2%, and 2.6% per hour, respectively). For the last 70 minutes of scanning (last 85 minutes of the scanning session, including a 15-minute break), an almost complete steady state (indicating equilibrium between plasma and brain tissue) was reached, with change in radioactivity in the thalamus, brainstem, and cerebellum of only 0.0 ± 1.0% (mean ± SE), 1.0 ± 1.0% (mean ± SE), and 1.0 ± 1.0% (±mean ± SE), respectively (determined by linear regression).

For the scans with cigarette smoking, decreases in total radioactivity for the 3 studied brain regions with the highest radioactivity accumulation (thalamus, brainstem, and cerebellum) were clearly dose dependent (Figure 2 and Figure 3). A single puff of a cigarette was the only amount of smoking that was followed by recovery of receptor availability within the 3-hour 50-minute time frame after smoking (Figure 2A-C), while the medium to high levels of smoking (one quarter of a cigarette to satiety) resulted in new steady-state conditions at 3 hours after smoking (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Smoking to satiety resulted in a profound decrease of radioactivity in all brain regions studied (Figure 2D). The dose-response curves for displacement of total and specifically bound radioactivities are shown in Figure 4A-C.

The mean ± SE effective dose of a cigarette required to occupy 50% of receptors (ED50) for the 3 primary regions of interest at 3.1 hours after smoking was 0.19 ± 0.05 (Table 1). After correcting for the imperfect steady state found in the control group that did not smoke (by multiplying the prebreak mean total radioactivities for the thalamus, brainstem, and cerebellum by 1.12, 1.12, and 1.10, respectively), ED50 was calculated to be 0.13 ± 0.03 (mean ± SE) of a cigarette (Table 1). The mean ± SE venous plasma nicotine concentration associated with 50% occupancy of receptors (EC50) was determined from the dose response curve (Figure 4D) to be 0.87 ± 0.16 ng/mL (5.3 ± 1.0 nM) (Table 1). Apparent binding potential (BP*) values for the thalamus (Table 1) were similar to those in another published report using 2-FA.29

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Effective Dose of a Cigarette and Effective Concentration of Venous Plasma Nicotine Needed to Occupy 50% of α4β2* nAChRs During Positron Emission Tomography Scanning for the 3 Primary Regions of Interesta

The mean receptor fractional occupancies at 3.1 hours after smoking 1 puff, 3 puffs, 1 full cigarette, and to satiety were 33%, 75%, 88%, and 95%, respectively (Figure 4) (Table 2). Earlier than 3.1 hours after smoking, we would hypothesize that the fractional occupancy of nAChRs would be even higher. For example, assuming a t1/2 (half-life) of venous plasma nicotine of 2.5 hours,27 we would expect that smoking 1 cigarette would result in venous plasma nicotine levels at 1 and 2.5 hours after smoking to be roughly 1.8 and 1.2 times higher than the levels at 3.1 hours. These higher nicotine levels would lead to estimated receptor occupancies at 1 and 2.5 hours of 93% and 90%, respectively.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Cigarette Dose, Venous Plasma Nicotine Concentration, and Percentage Change in Occupancy of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Regions of Interest From Before Smoking to 3.1 Hours After Smokinga

Craving was only alleviated with higher smoking levels (1 full cigarette or satiety). For the 5 smoking levels (none, 1 puff, 3 puffs, 1 cigarette, and satiety), changes in mean ± SD Urge to Smoke Scale scores (0- to 6-point scale) from before to after smoking were −0.8 ± 0.7, 0.2 ± 0.2, 0.1 ± 0.4, −4.6 ± 1.2, and −4.8 ± 1.1, respectively. Craving relief was temporary and elevated craving levels returned later during the scanning session. For example, a mean ± SD change of −2.3 ± 1.6 in Urge to Smoke Scale score was found from before to 2.5 hours after smoking for the group that smoked 1 full cigarette.

The central findings of this study indicate that typical daily smokers have nearly complete saturation of brain α4β2* nAChRs throughout the day. The ED50 (0.13 cigarette) is very small compared with smoking levels (1 to 2 cigarettes per hour) found in tobacco-dependent smokers. The EC50 of venous plasma nicotine (0.87 ng/mL or 5.4 nM) found herein is very low compared with venous plasma nicotine levels (which range from 10-37, 10-50, and 19-50 ng/mL for trough, afternoon, and peak levels, respectively)27,56 found in daily smokers. This EC50 estimate indicates that 96% to 98% of α4β2* nAChRs are occupied during the day in tobacco-dependent smokers. Additionally, the EC50 found herein is in the range of concentrations causing desensitization of 50% of α4β2* nAChRs. As demonstrated recently,57 100 seconds of coincubation of cells expressing α4β2* nAChRs with 10 nM of nicotine (1.6 ng/mL) resulted in 70% receptor desensitization. Thus, results of this study in the context of other α4β2* nAChR research indicate a nearly complete shift from other potential nAChR states (such as resting and intermediate desensitized)58 to the high-affinity desensitization state during the day in tobacco-dependent smokers. Such prolonged desensitization may be responsible for the up-regulation of these receptors found in smokers.59,60

In our study, craving was only reduced with near total occupancy of nAChRs, with up to one quarter of a cigarette doing little to alleviate craving, despite up to 75% receptor occupancy, whereas smoking 1 full cigarette or to satiety resulted in significant craving reductions and at least 88% and 95% receptor occupancy, respectively. Similarly, though roughly 50% of the presmoking craving level returned in the 1 full cigarette group 2.5 hours after smoking, the calculated receptor occupancy by nicotine for that time was roughly 90% (as described earlier).

Continued smoking (in tobacco-dependent smokers) despite near total α4β2* nAChR occupancy/desensitization may be explained in several ways. First, smokers may continue to smoke to avoid having free unbound receptors. In this situation, free (nondesensitized) receptors would be responsible for cigarette craving, and nicotine binding and desensitization of these nAChRs may alleviate craving. This action of nicotine may provide positive reinforcement and craving alleviation through frequency-sensitive dopamine release61,62 and/or decreased γ-aminobutyric acid tone.19 Second, it is possible that positive reinforcement from smoking is due to activation of other α4β2* nAChR subtypes that are not desensitized by high concentrations of nicotine and that are not labeled by 2-FA because of a smaller number of receptors or low affinity. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that activation of other α4β2* nAChRs could be involved in tobacco dependence, and it may be important to identify such receptors in future research. And third, factors other than nicotine binding to nAChRs may be at least partly responsible for craving alleviation and positive reinforcement (which is supported by studies demonstrating that denicotinized cigarettes partially alleviate craving63). In any case, because α4β2* nAChRs are the predominant receptor subtype in humans and 2-FA labels almost the entire population of these receptors,64 the conclusion from our study still indicates that near complete desensitization of nAChRs has an important role in the pathophysiology of tobacco dependence.

This study should be interpreted in the context of several limitations. First, cigarette smokers vary in their rate and depth of inhalation of cigarettes, and it is recognized that these interindividual differences could have affected the ED50 calculation (though, as noted earlier, all subjects smoked cigarettes with similar nicotine contents and the total amount smoked was measured). Second, test-retest data on the bolus-plus-infusion method used have not yet been published, although there was relatively little variability within study subgroups (based on smoking dosage) compared with the robust effects of cigarette smoking and the ED50 and EC50 determined herein remained relatively stable from region to region. Third, repeated breaks in scanning (which were necessary for subject comfort) may have led to slight shifts in overall radioactivity determinations due to small differences in position from before to after each scanning break, though (as noted earlier) a head holder and laser light positioning were used to attempt to accurately reposition subjects. And fourth, venous rather than arterial nicotine levels were used for study calculations, and arterial levels are reported to be higher than venous at the time of smoking.65 However, study calculations were performed on venous nicotine levels 3.1 hours after smoking, a time at which venous and arterial levels would be expected to be similar,65 so that our results should provide a reasonable approximation of EC50 for arterial, as well as venous, nicotine levels.

Finally, the association between cigarette smoking and high receptor occupancy found herein has implications for the study of indirect cigarette/nicotine exposures. Studies of fetal exposure to maternal smoking,66 neonate exposure to breast milk of mothers who smoke,67 and prolonged environmental tobacco smoke exposure68,69 all show evidence of venous plasma nicotine levels higher than 1 ng/mL in those who are indirectly exposed, with fetal levels being even higher than maternal levels. Our study indicates that even low levels of exposure result in substantial occupancy of brain α4β2* nAChRs, suggesting significant occupancy and desensitization of α4β2* nAChRs in subjects indirectly exposed to nicotine and pointing to the need for further research to address this issue.

Correspondence: Arthur L. Brody, MD, 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite 2200, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (abrody@ucla.edu).

Submitted for Publication: July 18, 2005; final revision received November 6, 2005; accepted November 8, 2005.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) grants RO1 DA15059 and DA20872 (Dr Brody) and RO1 DA14093 (Dr London), a Veterans Affairs Type I Merit Review Award (Dr Brody), Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program grants 11RT-0024 (Dr Brody) and 10RT-0091 (Dr London), Office of National Drug Control Policy contract DABT63-00-C-1003 (Dr London), and the NIDA intramural research program (Drs Chefer and Mukhin).

Acknowledgment: We thank the laboratory of Peyton Jacob III, PhD, for determining venous plasma nicotine levels and Josephine Ribe, BS, and Michael Clark, BS, for performing positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, respectively.

Michaud  CMMurray  CJBloom  BR Burden of disease—implications for future research. JAMA 2001;285535- 539
PubMed Link to Article
Ezzati  MLopez  AD Estimates of global mortality attributable to smoking in 2000. Lancet 2003;362847- 852
PubMed Link to Article
Fiore  MCBailey  WCCohen  SJDorfman  SFGoldstein  MGGritz  ERHeyman  RBJaén  CRKottke  TELando  HAMecklenburg  REMullen  PDNett  LMRobinson  LStitzer  MLTommasello  ACVillejo  LWewers  ME Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: Clinical Practice Guideline.  Rockville, Md US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service2000;
Ashenden  RSilagy  CWeller  D A systematic review of the effectiveness of promoting lifestyle change in general practice. Fam Pract 1997;14160- 176
PubMed Link to Article
Jorenby  DELeischow  SJNides  MARennard  SIJohnston  JAHughes  ARSmith  SSMuramoto  MLDaughton  DMDoan  KFiore  MCBaker  TB A controlled trial of sustained-release bupropion, a nicotine patch, or both for smoking cessation. N Engl J Med 1999;340685- 691
PubMed Link to Article
Henningfield  JEFant  RV Tobacco use as drug addiction: the scientific foundation. Nicotine Tob Res 1999;1 ((suppl 2)) S31- S35
PubMed Link to Article
Cohen  CPickworth  WBHenningfield  JE Cigarette smoking and addiction. Clin Chest Med 1991;12701- 710
PubMed
Koob  GF Drugs of abuse: anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1992;13177- 184
PubMed Link to Article
West  RShiffman  S Effect of oral nicotine dosing forms on cigarette withdrawal symptoms and craving. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2001;155115- 122
PubMed Link to Article
Newhouse  PAPotter  ASingh  A Effects of nicotinic stimulation on cognitive performance. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2004;436- 46
PubMed Link to Article
Ernst  MHeishman  SJSpurgeon  LLondon  ED Smoking history and nicotine effects on cognitive performance. Neuropsychopharmacology 2001;25313- 319
PubMed Link to Article
Mendrek  AMonterosso  JSimon  SLJarvik  MBrody  AOlmstead  RDomier  CPCohen  MSErnst  MLondon  ED Working memory in cigarette smokers: comparison to non-smokers and effects of abstinence. Addict Behav 2006;31833- 844
PubMed Link to Article
Lukas  RJChangeux  JPLe Novere  NAlbuquerque  EXBalfour  DJBerg  DKBertrand  DChiappinelli  VAClarke  PBCollins  ACDani  JAGrady  SRKellar  KJLindstrom  JMMarks  MJQuik  MTaylor  PWWonnacott  S International Union of Pharmacology, XX: current status of the nomenclature for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and their subunits. Pharmacol Rev 1999;51397- 401
PubMed
Di Chiara  GImperato  A Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988;855274- 5278
PubMed Link to Article
Pontieri  FETanda  GOrzi  FDi Chiara  G Effects of nicotine on the nucleus accumbens and similarity to those of addictive drugs. Nature 1996;382255- 257
PubMed Link to Article
SzirakiLipovac  MNHashim  ASershen  HAllen  DCooper  TCzobor  PLajtha  A Differences in nicotine-induced dopamine release and nicotine pharmacokinetics between Lewis and Fischer 344 rats. Neurochem Res 2001;26609- 617
PubMed Link to Article
Damsma  GDay  JFibiger  HC Lack of tolerance to nicotine-induced dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens. Eur J Pharmacol 1989;168363- 368
PubMed Link to Article
Corrigall  WACoen  KMAdamson  KL Self-administered nicotine activates the mesolimbic dopamine system through the ventral tegmental area. Brain Res 1994;653278- 284
PubMed Link to Article
Mansvelder  HDKeath  JRMcGehee  DS Synaptic mechanisms underlie nicotine-induced excitability of brain reward areas. Neuron 2002;33905- 919
PubMed Link to Article
Leshner  AIKoob  GF Drugs of abuse and the brain. Proc Assoc Am Physicians 1999;11199- 108
PubMed Link to Article
Tapper  ARMcKinney  SLNashmi  RSchwarz  JDeshpande  PLabarca  CWhiteaker  PMarks  MJCollins  ACLester  HA Nicotine activation of alpha4* receptors: sufficient for reward, tolerance, and sensitization. Science 2004;3061029- 1032
PubMed Link to Article
Picciotto  MRZoli  MChangeux  JP Use of knock-out mice to determine the molecular basis for the actions of nicotine. Nicotine Tob Res 1999;1 ((suppl 2)) S121- S125
PubMed Link to Article
Salminen  OMurphy  KLMcIntosh  JMDrago  JMarks  MJCollins  ACGrady  SR Subunit composition and pharmacology of two classes of striatal presynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors mediating dopamine release in mice. Mol Pharmacol 2004;651526- 1535
PubMed Link to Article
Liu  XKoren  AOYee  SKPechnick  RNPoland  RELondon  ED Self-administration of 5-iodo-A-85380, a beta 2-selective nicotinic receptor ligand, by operantly trained rats. Neuroreport 2003;141503- 1505
PubMed Link to Article
Maskos  UMolles  BEPons  SBesson  MGuiard  BPGuilloux  JPEvrard  ACazala  PCormier  AMameli-Engvall  MDufour  NCloez-Tayarani  IBemelmans  APMallet  JGardier  AMDavid  VFaure  PGranon  SChangeux  JP Nicotine reinforcement and cognition restored by targeted expression of nicotinic receptors. Nature 2005;436103- 107
PubMed Link to Article
Sihver  WNordberg  ALangstrom  BMukhin  AGKoren  AOKimes  ASLondon  ED Development of ligands for in vivo imaging of cerebral nicotinic receptors. Behav Brain Res 2000;113143- 157
PubMed Link to Article
Benowitz  NLPorchet  HJacob  PI Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and pharmacodynamics of nicotine. In:Wonnacott  SRussell  MAHStolerman  IPeds.Nicotine Psychopharmacology: Molecular, Cellular, and Behavioural Aspects. Oxford, England Oxford University Press1990;112- 157
Koren  AOHorti  AGMukhin  AGGundisch  DKimes  ASDannals  RFLondon  ED 2-, 5-, and 6-halo-3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy)pyridines. J Med Chem 1998;413690- 3698
PubMed Link to Article
Chefer  SILondon  EDKoren  AOPavlova  OAKurian  VKimes  ASHorti  AGMukhin  AG Graphical analysis of 2-[F-18]FA binding to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in rhesus monkey brain. Synapse 2003;4825- 34
PubMed Link to Article
Gallezot  JDBottlaender  MGregoire  MCRoumenov  DDeverre  JRCoulon  COttaviani  MDolle  FSyrota  AValette  H In vivo imaging of human cerebral nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with 2-18F-fluoro-A-85380 and PET. J Nucl Med 2005;46240- 247
PubMed
Valette  HBottlaender  MDolle  FCoulon  COttaviani  MSyrota  A Long-lasting occupancy of central nicotinic acetylcholine receptors after smoking: a PET study in monkeys. J Neurochem 2003;84105- 111
PubMed Link to Article
Ding  YSVolkow  NDLogan  JGarza  VPappas  NKing  PFowler  JS Occupancy of brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by nicotine doses equivalent to those obtained when smoking a cigarette. Synapse 2000;35234- 237
PubMed Link to Article
Obrzut  SLKoren  AOMandelkern  MABrody  ALHoh  CKLondon  ED Whole-body radiation dosimetry of 2-[18F]fluoro-A-85380 in human PET imaging studies. Nucl Med Biol 2005;32869- 874
Link to Article
Mitkovski  SVillemagne  VLNovakovic  KEO'Keefe  GTochon-Danguy  HMulligan  RSDickinson  KLSaunder  TGregoire  MCBottlaender  MDolle  FRowe  CC Simplified quantification of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with 2[18F]F-A-85380 PET. Nucl Med Biol 2005;32585- 591
PubMed Link to Article
Kimes  ASHorti  AGLondon  EDChefer  SIContoreggi  CErnst  MFriello  PKoren  AOKurian  VMatochik  JAPavlova  OVaupel  DBMukhin  AG 2-[18F]F-A-85380: PET imaging of brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and whole body distribution in humans. FASEB J 2003;171331- 1333
PubMed
First  MBSpitzer  RLGibbon  MWilliams  JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders–Patient Edition (SCID-I/P, version 2.0).  New York Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute1995;
Fagerström  KO Measuring the degree of physical dependence to tobacco smoking with reference to individualization of treatment. Addict Behav 1978;3235- 241
PubMed Link to Article
Heatherton  TFKozlowski  LTFrecker  RCFagerström  KO The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict 1991;861119- 1127
PubMed Link to Article
Beck  ATWard  CHMendelson  MMock  JErbaugh  J An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4561- 571
PubMed Link to Article
Spielberger  C Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.  Palo Alto, Calif Consulting Psychologists Press1983;
Shiffman  SMJarvik  ME Smoking withdrawal symptoms in two weeks of abstinence. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1976;5035- 39
PubMed Link to Article
Carson  RE PET physiological measurements using constant infusion. Nucl Med Biol 2000;27657- 660
PubMed Link to Article
Carson  REChanning  MABlasberg  RGDunn  BBCohen  RMRice  KCHerscovitch  P Comparison of bolus and infusion methods for receptor quantitation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1993;1324- 42
PubMed Link to Article
US Federal Trade Commission, “Tar,” Nicotine, and Carbon Monoxide of the Smoke of 1294 Varieties of Domestic Cigarettes for the Year 1998.  Washington, DC US Federal Trade Commission2000;
Jacob  P  IIIWilson  MBenowitz  NL Improved gas chromatographic method for the determination of nicotine and cotinine in biologic fluids. J Chromatogr 1981;22261- 70
PubMed Link to Article
Jarvik  MEMadsen  DCOlmstead  REIwamoto-Schaap  PNElins  JLBenowitz  NL Nicotine blood levels and subjective craving for cigarettes. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2000;66553- 558
PubMed Link to Article
Brody  ALMandelkern  MALondon  EDChildress  ARLee  GSBota  RGHo  MLSaxena  SBaxter  LR  JrMadsen  DJarvik  ME Brain metabolic changes during cigarette craving. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002;591162- 1172
PubMed Link to Article
Dhawan  VKazumata  KRobeson  WBelakhlef  AMargouleff  CChaly  TNakamura  TDahl  RMargouleff  DEidelberg  D Quantitative brain PET: comparison of 2D and 3D acquisitions on the GE Advance Scanner. Clin Positron Imaging 1998;1135- 144
PubMed Link to Article
Doll  FDolci  LValette  HHinnen  FVaufrey  FGuenther  IFuseau  CCoulon  CBottlaender  MCrouzel  C Synthesis and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in vivo binding properties of 2-fluoro-3-[2(S)-2-azetidinylmethoxypyridine. J Med Chem 1999;422251- 2299
PubMed Link to Article
Woods  RPMazziotta  JCCherry  SR MRI-PET registration with automated algorithm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17536- 546
PubMed Link to Article
London  EDWaller  SBWamsley  JK Autoradiographic localization of [3H]nicotine binding sites in the rat brain. Neurosci Lett 1985;53179- 184
PubMed Link to Article
Villemagne  VLHorti  AScheffel  URavert  HTFinley  PClough  DJLondon  EDWagner  HN  JrDannals  RF Imaging nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with fluorine-18-FPH, an epibatidine analog. J Nucl Med 1997;381737- 1741
PubMed
Fujita  MIchise  Mvan Dyck  CHZoghbi  SSTamagnan  GMukhin  AGBozkurt  ASeneca  NTipre  DDeNucci  CCIida  HVaupel  DBHorti  AGKoren  AOKimes  ASLondon  EDSeibyl  JPBaldwin  RMInnis  RB Quantification of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in human brain using [I-123]5-I-A-85380 SPET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;301620- 1629
PubMed Link to Article
Valette  HBottlaender  MDolle  FGuenther  ICoulon  CHinnen  FFuseau  COttaviani  MCrouzel  C Characterization of the nicotinic ligand 2-[F-18]fluoro-3-[2(S)-2-azetidinylmethoxy]pyridine in vivo. Life Sci 1999;64PL93- PL97
PubMed
Ichise  MMeyer  JHYonekura  Y An introduction to PET and SPECT neuroreceptor quantification models. J Nucl Med 2001;42755- 763
PubMed
Hukkanen  JJacob  P  IIIBenowitz  NL Metabolism and disposition kinetics of nicotine. Pharmacol Rev 2005;5779- 115
PubMed Link to Article
Paradiso  KGSteinbach  JH Nicotine is highly effective at producing desensitization of rat alpha4beta2 neuronal nicotinic receptors. J Physiol 2003;553857- 871
PubMed Link to Article
Quick  MWLester  RA Desensitization of neuronal nicotinic receptors. J Neurobiol 2002;53457- 478
PubMed Link to Article
Benwell  MEBalfour  DJKAnderson  JM Evidence that tobacco smoking increases the density of (-)-[3H]nicotine binding sites in human brain. J Neurochem 1988;501243- 1247
PubMed Link to Article
Breese  CRMarks  MJLogel  JAdams  CESullivan  BCollins  ACLeonard  S Effect of smoking history on [3H]nicotine binding in human postmortem brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997;2827- 13
PubMed
Rice  MECragg  SJ Nicotine amplifies reward-related dopamine signals in striatum. Nat Neurosci 2004;7583- 584
PubMed Link to Article
Zhang  HSulzer  D Frequency-dependent modulation of dopamine release by nicotine. Nat Neurosci 2004;7581- 582
PubMed Link to Article
Robinson  MLHoutsmuller  EJMoolchan  ETPickworth  WB Placebo cigarettes in smoking research. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2000;8326- 332
PubMed Link to Article
Chefer  SIMukhin  AGHorti  AGKoren  ADPavlova  OIKurian  VStratton  MKimes  ASLondon  ED 2-[18F]-fluoro-a-85380. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Engineering Techniques in Medicine and Biology2000;409- 415
Henningfield  JEStapleton  JMBenowitz  NLGrayson  RFLondon  ED Higher levels of nicotine in arterial than in venous blood after cigarette smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend 1993;3323- 29
PubMed Link to Article
Luck  WNau  HHansen  RSteldinger  R Extent of nicotine and cotinine transfer to the human fetus, placenta and amniotic fluid of smoking mothers. Dev Pharmacol Ther 1985;8384- 395
PubMed
Becker  ABManfreda  JFerguson  ACDimich-Ward  HWatson  WTChan-Yeung  M Breast-feeding and environmental tobacco smoke exposure. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153689- 691
PubMed Link to Article
Jarvis  MJRussell  MAFeyerabend  C Absorption of nicotine and carbon monoxide from passive smoking under natural conditions of exposure. Thorax 1983;38829- 833
PubMed Link to Article
Jarvis  MJ Uptake of environmental tobacco smoke. IARC Sci Publ 1987; ((87)) 43- 58
PubMed

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Time-activity curves (mean ± SEM) for the 2 subjects undergoing full (8 hours) scanning with no smoking. The graphs demonstrate that 3 to 4 hours from the beginning of radioligand infusion are needed to reach a near steady state in the primary regions of interest for the bolus/infusion paradigm used herein. The average increase in radioactivity starting 3.5 hours after initiation of 2-[18F]fluoro-3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy) pyridine (2-F-A-85380) administration was 3.2%, 3.2%, and 2.6% per hour for the thalamus, brainstem, and cerebellum, respectively.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Time-activity curves for the 5 smoking levels for the primary regions of interest. A, Thalamus. B, Brainstem. C, Cerebellum. Radioactivity is expressed as percentage of baseline value (mean radioactivity for the hour before the smoking break ± standard errors of the mean between subjects). 1 indicates 0 cigarettes; 2 indicates 1 puff; 3 indicates 3 puffs; 4 indicates 1 full cigarette; and 5 indicates satiety (2.8 cigarettes). Dotted lines indicate the time of the smoking break. D, Displacement of radioactivity in the whole brain and regions of interest in a subject who smoked to satiety (2.5 cigarettes) during the break (mean ± SE in volume of interest).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.

2-[18F]fluoro-3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy) pyridine (2-F-A-85380) positron emission tomography (PET) images before (top row) and 3.1 hours after (bottom row) cigarette smoking. Images were obtained by averaging the six 10-minute frames over the 1 hour prior to the smoking break and by averaging the seven 10-minute scans from a mean of 3.1 hours after smoking the cigarette amount listed. The far right column shows a magnetic resonance image (MRI) of the brain and a PET image of nondisplaceable radioactivity distribution (calculated). All PET images were aligned to the level shown on the MRI.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 4.

Effects of variable smoking (number of cigarettes) and venous plasma nicotine levels on radiotracer displacement. A, Percentage of displacement of total radioactivity (Ct) in regions of interest for the range of smoking levels from 0 to 2.8 cigarettes, based on the ratio of displaced Ct by each cigarette dose to prebreak Ct, without correction for the imperfect steady state of the radiotracer found in control scans. B and C, Displacement of specific binding (SB) (a measure that takes into account nondisplaceable radioactivity derived from the asymptotic portion of the saturation curve in part A) by the varying smoking levels without and with correction for the imperfect steady state, respectively. D, Specific binding displacement as a function of venous plasma nicotine levels, corrected.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Effective Dose of a Cigarette and Effective Concentration of Venous Plasma Nicotine Needed to Occupy 50% of α4β2* nAChRs During Positron Emission Tomography Scanning for the 3 Primary Regions of Interesta
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Cigarette Dose, Venous Plasma Nicotine Concentration, and Percentage Change in Occupancy of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Regions of Interest From Before Smoking to 3.1 Hours After Smokinga

References

Michaud  CMMurray  CJBloom  BR Burden of disease—implications for future research. JAMA 2001;285535- 539
PubMed Link to Article
Ezzati  MLopez  AD Estimates of global mortality attributable to smoking in 2000. Lancet 2003;362847- 852
PubMed Link to Article
Fiore  MCBailey  WCCohen  SJDorfman  SFGoldstein  MGGritz  ERHeyman  RBJaén  CRKottke  TELando  HAMecklenburg  REMullen  PDNett  LMRobinson  LStitzer  MLTommasello  ACVillejo  LWewers  ME Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: Clinical Practice Guideline.  Rockville, Md US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service2000;
Ashenden  RSilagy  CWeller  D A systematic review of the effectiveness of promoting lifestyle change in general practice. Fam Pract 1997;14160- 176
PubMed Link to Article
Jorenby  DELeischow  SJNides  MARennard  SIJohnston  JAHughes  ARSmith  SSMuramoto  MLDaughton  DMDoan  KFiore  MCBaker  TB A controlled trial of sustained-release bupropion, a nicotine patch, or both for smoking cessation. N Engl J Med 1999;340685- 691
PubMed Link to Article
Henningfield  JEFant  RV Tobacco use as drug addiction: the scientific foundation. Nicotine Tob Res 1999;1 ((suppl 2)) S31- S35
PubMed Link to Article
Cohen  CPickworth  WBHenningfield  JE Cigarette smoking and addiction. Clin Chest Med 1991;12701- 710
PubMed
Koob  GF Drugs of abuse: anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1992;13177- 184
PubMed Link to Article
West  RShiffman  S Effect of oral nicotine dosing forms on cigarette withdrawal symptoms and craving. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2001;155115- 122
PubMed Link to Article
Newhouse  PAPotter  ASingh  A Effects of nicotinic stimulation on cognitive performance. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2004;436- 46
PubMed Link to Article
Ernst  MHeishman  SJSpurgeon  LLondon  ED Smoking history and nicotine effects on cognitive performance. Neuropsychopharmacology 2001;25313- 319
PubMed Link to Article
Mendrek  AMonterosso  JSimon  SLJarvik  MBrody  AOlmstead  RDomier  CPCohen  MSErnst  MLondon  ED Working memory in cigarette smokers: comparison to non-smokers and effects of abstinence. Addict Behav 2006;31833- 844
PubMed Link to Article
Lukas  RJChangeux  JPLe Novere  NAlbuquerque  EXBalfour  DJBerg  DKBertrand  DChiappinelli  VAClarke  PBCollins  ACDani  JAGrady  SRKellar  KJLindstrom  JMMarks  MJQuik  MTaylor  PWWonnacott  S International Union of Pharmacology, XX: current status of the nomenclature for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and their subunits. Pharmacol Rev 1999;51397- 401
PubMed
Di Chiara  GImperato  A Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988;855274- 5278
PubMed Link to Article
Pontieri  FETanda  GOrzi  FDi Chiara  G Effects of nicotine on the nucleus accumbens and similarity to those of addictive drugs. Nature 1996;382255- 257
PubMed Link to Article
SzirakiLipovac  MNHashim  ASershen  HAllen  DCooper  TCzobor  PLajtha  A Differences in nicotine-induced dopamine release and nicotine pharmacokinetics between Lewis and Fischer 344 rats. Neurochem Res 2001;26609- 617
PubMed Link to Article
Damsma  GDay  JFibiger  HC Lack of tolerance to nicotine-induced dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens. Eur J Pharmacol 1989;168363- 368
PubMed Link to Article
Corrigall  WACoen  KMAdamson  KL Self-administered nicotine activates the mesolimbic dopamine system through the ventral tegmental area. Brain Res 1994;653278- 284
PubMed Link to Article
Mansvelder  HDKeath  JRMcGehee  DS Synaptic mechanisms underlie nicotine-induced excitability of brain reward areas. Neuron 2002;33905- 919
PubMed Link to Article
Leshner  AIKoob  GF Drugs of abuse and the brain. Proc Assoc Am Physicians 1999;11199- 108
PubMed Link to Article
Tapper  ARMcKinney  SLNashmi  RSchwarz  JDeshpande  PLabarca  CWhiteaker  PMarks  MJCollins  ACLester  HA Nicotine activation of alpha4* receptors: sufficient for reward, tolerance, and sensitization. Science 2004;3061029- 1032
PubMed Link to Article
Picciotto  MRZoli  MChangeux  JP Use of knock-out mice to determine the molecular basis for the actions of nicotine. Nicotine Tob Res 1999;1 ((suppl 2)) S121- S125
PubMed Link to Article
Salminen  OMurphy  KLMcIntosh  JMDrago  JMarks  MJCollins  ACGrady  SR Subunit composition and pharmacology of two classes of striatal presynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors mediating dopamine release in mice. Mol Pharmacol 2004;651526- 1535
PubMed Link to Article
Liu  XKoren  AOYee  SKPechnick  RNPoland  RELondon  ED Self-administration of 5-iodo-A-85380, a beta 2-selective nicotinic receptor ligand, by operantly trained rats. Neuroreport 2003;141503- 1505
PubMed Link to Article
Maskos  UMolles  BEPons  SBesson  MGuiard  BPGuilloux  JPEvrard  ACazala  PCormier  AMameli-Engvall  MDufour  NCloez-Tayarani  IBemelmans  APMallet  JGardier  AMDavid  VFaure  PGranon  SChangeux  JP Nicotine reinforcement and cognition restored by targeted expression of nicotinic receptors. Nature 2005;436103- 107
PubMed Link to Article
Sihver  WNordberg  ALangstrom  BMukhin  AGKoren  AOKimes  ASLondon  ED Development of ligands for in vivo imaging of cerebral nicotinic receptors. Behav Brain Res 2000;113143- 157
PubMed Link to Article
Benowitz  NLPorchet  HJacob  PI Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and pharmacodynamics of nicotine. In:Wonnacott  SRussell  MAHStolerman  IPeds.Nicotine Psychopharmacology: Molecular, Cellular, and Behavioural Aspects. Oxford, England Oxford University Press1990;112- 157
Koren  AOHorti  AGMukhin  AGGundisch  DKimes  ASDannals  RFLondon  ED 2-, 5-, and 6-halo-3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy)pyridines. J Med Chem 1998;413690- 3698
PubMed Link to Article
Chefer  SILondon  EDKoren  AOPavlova  OAKurian  VKimes  ASHorti  AGMukhin  AG Graphical analysis of 2-[F-18]FA binding to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in rhesus monkey brain. Synapse 2003;4825- 34
PubMed Link to Article
Gallezot  JDBottlaender  MGregoire  MCRoumenov  DDeverre  JRCoulon  COttaviani  MDolle  FSyrota  AValette  H In vivo imaging of human cerebral nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with 2-18F-fluoro-A-85380 and PET. J Nucl Med 2005;46240- 247
PubMed
Valette  HBottlaender  MDolle  FCoulon  COttaviani  MSyrota  A Long-lasting occupancy of central nicotinic acetylcholine receptors after smoking: a PET study in monkeys. J Neurochem 2003;84105- 111
PubMed Link to Article
Ding  YSVolkow  NDLogan  JGarza  VPappas  NKing  PFowler  JS Occupancy of brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by nicotine doses equivalent to those obtained when smoking a cigarette. Synapse 2000;35234- 237
PubMed Link to Article
Obrzut  SLKoren  AOMandelkern  MABrody  ALHoh  CKLondon  ED Whole-body radiation dosimetry of 2-[18F]fluoro-A-85380 in human PET imaging studies. Nucl Med Biol 2005;32869- 874
Link to Article
Mitkovski  SVillemagne  VLNovakovic  KEO'Keefe  GTochon-Danguy  HMulligan  RSDickinson  KLSaunder  TGregoire  MCBottlaender  MDolle  FRowe  CC Simplified quantification of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with 2[18F]F-A-85380 PET. Nucl Med Biol 2005;32585- 591
PubMed Link to Article
Kimes  ASHorti  AGLondon  EDChefer  SIContoreggi  CErnst  MFriello  PKoren  AOKurian  VMatochik  JAPavlova  OVaupel  DBMukhin  AG 2-[18F]F-A-85380: PET imaging of brain nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and whole body distribution in humans. FASEB J 2003;171331- 1333
PubMed
First  MBSpitzer  RLGibbon  MWilliams  JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders–Patient Edition (SCID-I/P, version 2.0).  New York Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute1995;
Fagerström  KO Measuring the degree of physical dependence to tobacco smoking with reference to individualization of treatment. Addict Behav 1978;3235- 241
PubMed Link to Article
Heatherton  TFKozlowski  LTFrecker  RCFagerström  KO The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict 1991;861119- 1127
PubMed Link to Article
Beck  ATWard  CHMendelson  MMock  JErbaugh  J An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4561- 571
PubMed Link to Article
Spielberger  C Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.  Palo Alto, Calif Consulting Psychologists Press1983;
Shiffman  SMJarvik  ME Smoking withdrawal symptoms in two weeks of abstinence. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1976;5035- 39
PubMed Link to Article
Carson  RE PET physiological measurements using constant infusion. Nucl Med Biol 2000;27657- 660
PubMed Link to Article
Carson  REChanning  MABlasberg  RGDunn  BBCohen  RMRice  KCHerscovitch  P Comparison of bolus and infusion methods for receptor quantitation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1993;1324- 42
PubMed Link to Article
US Federal Trade Commission, “Tar,” Nicotine, and Carbon Monoxide of the Smoke of 1294 Varieties of Domestic Cigarettes for the Year 1998.  Washington, DC US Federal Trade Commission2000;
Jacob  P  IIIWilson  MBenowitz  NL Improved gas chromatographic method for the determination of nicotine and cotinine in biologic fluids. J Chromatogr 1981;22261- 70
PubMed Link to Article
Jarvik  MEMadsen  DCOlmstead  REIwamoto-Schaap  PNElins  JLBenowitz  NL Nicotine blood levels and subjective craving for cigarettes. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2000;66553- 558
PubMed Link to Article
Brody  ALMandelkern  MALondon  EDChildress  ARLee  GSBota  RGHo  MLSaxena  SBaxter  LR  JrMadsen  DJarvik  ME Brain metabolic changes during cigarette craving. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002;591162- 1172
PubMed Link to Article
Dhawan  VKazumata  KRobeson  WBelakhlef  AMargouleff  CChaly  TNakamura  TDahl  RMargouleff  DEidelberg  D Quantitative brain PET: comparison of 2D and 3D acquisitions on the GE Advance Scanner. Clin Positron Imaging 1998;1135- 144
PubMed Link to Article
Doll  FDolci  LValette  HHinnen  FVaufrey  FGuenther  IFuseau  CCoulon  CBottlaender  MCrouzel  C Synthesis and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in vivo binding properties of 2-fluoro-3-[2(S)-2-azetidinylmethoxypyridine. J Med Chem 1999;422251- 2299
PubMed Link to Article
Woods  RPMazziotta  JCCherry  SR MRI-PET registration with automated algorithm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17536- 546
PubMed Link to Article
London  EDWaller  SBWamsley  JK Autoradiographic localization of [3H]nicotine binding sites in the rat brain. Neurosci Lett 1985;53179- 184
PubMed Link to Article
Villemagne  VLHorti  AScheffel  URavert  HTFinley  PClough  DJLondon  EDWagner  HN  JrDannals  RF Imaging nicotinic acetylcholine receptors with fluorine-18-FPH, an epibatidine analog. J Nucl Med 1997;381737- 1741
PubMed
Fujita  MIchise  Mvan Dyck  CHZoghbi  SSTamagnan  GMukhin  AGBozkurt  ASeneca  NTipre  DDeNucci  CCIida  HVaupel  DBHorti  AGKoren  AOKimes  ASLondon  EDSeibyl  JPBaldwin  RMInnis  RB Quantification of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in human brain using [I-123]5-I-A-85380 SPET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;301620- 1629
PubMed Link to Article
Valette  HBottlaender  MDolle  FGuenther  ICoulon  CHinnen  FFuseau  COttaviani  MCrouzel  C Characterization of the nicotinic ligand 2-[F-18]fluoro-3-[2(S)-2-azetidinylmethoxy]pyridine in vivo. Life Sci 1999;64PL93- PL97
PubMed
Ichise  MMeyer  JHYonekura  Y An introduction to PET and SPECT neuroreceptor quantification models. J Nucl Med 2001;42755- 763
PubMed
Hukkanen  JJacob  P  IIIBenowitz  NL Metabolism and disposition kinetics of nicotine. Pharmacol Rev 2005;5779- 115
PubMed Link to Article
Paradiso  KGSteinbach  JH Nicotine is highly effective at producing desensitization of rat alpha4beta2 neuronal nicotinic receptors. J Physiol 2003;553857- 871
PubMed Link to Article
Quick  MWLester  RA Desensitization of neuronal nicotinic receptors. J Neurobiol 2002;53457- 478
PubMed Link to Article
Benwell  MEBalfour  DJKAnderson  JM Evidence that tobacco smoking increases the density of (-)-[3H]nicotine binding sites in human brain. J Neurochem 1988;501243- 1247
PubMed Link to Article
Breese  CRMarks  MJLogel  JAdams  CESullivan  BCollins  ACLeonard  S Effect of smoking history on [3H]nicotine binding in human postmortem brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997;2827- 13
PubMed
Rice  MECragg  SJ Nicotine amplifies reward-related dopamine signals in striatum. Nat Neurosci 2004;7583- 584
PubMed Link to Article
Zhang  HSulzer  D Frequency-dependent modulation of dopamine release by nicotine. Nat Neurosci 2004;7581- 582
PubMed Link to Article
Robinson  MLHoutsmuller  EJMoolchan  ETPickworth  WB Placebo cigarettes in smoking research. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2000;8326- 332
PubMed Link to Article
Chefer  SIMukhin  AGHorti  AGKoren  ADPavlova  OIKurian  VStratton  MKimes  ASLondon  ED 2-[18F]-fluoro-a-85380. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics and Engineering Techniques in Medicine and Biology2000;409- 415
Henningfield  JEStapleton  JMBenowitz  NLGrayson  RFLondon  ED Higher levels of nicotine in arterial than in venous blood after cigarette smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend 1993;3323- 29
PubMed Link to Article
Luck  WNau  HHansen  RSteldinger  R Extent of nicotine and cotinine transfer to the human fetus, placenta and amniotic fluid of smoking mothers. Dev Pharmacol Ther 1985;8384- 395
PubMed
Becker  ABManfreda  JFerguson  ACDimich-Ward  HWatson  WTChan-Yeung  M Breast-feeding and environmental tobacco smoke exposure. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153689- 691
PubMed Link to Article
Jarvis  MJRussell  MAFeyerabend  C Absorption of nicotine and carbon monoxide from passive smoking under natural conditions of exposure. Thorax 1983;38829- 833
PubMed Link to Article
Jarvis  MJ Uptake of environmental tobacco smoke. IARC Sci Publ 1987; ((87)) 43- 58
PubMed

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 161

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles