<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>JAMA Psychiatry: Adolescent Medicine Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:43:50 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@archpsyc.jamanetwork.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@archpsyc.jamanetwork.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Evidence for Increased Glutamatergic Cortical Facilitation in Children and Adolescents With Major Depressive Disorder Glutamatergic Cortical Facilitation and MDD </title>
      <link>http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1555601</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Croarkin PE, Nakonezny PA, Husain MM, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Context&lt;/div&gt;Converging lines of evidence implicate the glutamate and γ-aminobutyric acid neurotransmitter systems in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder. Transcranial magnetic stimulation cortical excitability and inhibition paradigms have been used to assess cortical glutamatergic and γ-aminobutyric acid–mediated tone in adults with major depressive disorder, but not in children and adolescents.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective&lt;/div&gt;To compare measures of cortical excitability and inhibition with 4 different paradigms in a group of children and adolescents with major depressive disorder vs healthy controls.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design&lt;/div&gt;Cross-sectional study examining medication-free children and adolescents (aged 9-17 years) with major depressive disorder compared with healthy controls. Cortical excitability was assessed with motor threshold and intracortical facilitation measures. Cortical inhibition was measured with cortical silent period and intracortical inhibition paradigms.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting&lt;/div&gt;University-based child and adolescent psychiatry clinic and neurostimulation laboratory.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Patients&lt;/div&gt;Twenty-four participants with major depressive disorder and 22 healthy controls matched for age and sex. Patients with major depressive disorder were medication naive and had moderate to severe symptoms based on an evaluation with a child and adolescent psychiatrist and scores on the Children's Depression Rating Scale–Revised.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main Outcome Measures&lt;/div&gt;Motor threshold, intracortical facilitation, cortical silent period, and intracortical inhibition.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;Compared with healthy controls, depressed patients had significantly increased intracortical facilitation at interstimulus intervals of 10 and 15 milliseconds bilaterally. There were no significant group differences in cortical inhibition measures.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusions&lt;/div&gt;These findings suggest that major depressive disorder in children and adolescents is associated with increased intracortical facilitation and excessive glutamatergic activity.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">70</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">3</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">291</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">299</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/2013.jamapsychiatry.24</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1555601</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Prevalence, Correlates, and Treatment of Lifetime Suicidal Behavior Among Adolescents Results From the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement  Lifetime Suicidal Behavior Among Adolescents </title>
      <link>http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1555602</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Nock MK, Green J, Hwang I, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Context&lt;/div&gt;Although suicide is the third leading cause of death among US adolescents, little is known about the prevalence, correlates, or treatment of its immediate precursors, adolescent suicidal behaviors (ie, suicide ideation, plans, and attempts).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objectives&lt;/div&gt;To estimate the lifetime prevalence of suicidal behaviors among US adolescents and the associations of retrospectively reported, temporally primary DSM-IV disorders with the subsequent onset of suicidal behaviors.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design&lt;/div&gt;Dual-frame national sample of adolescents from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting&lt;/div&gt;Face-to-face household interviews with adolescents and questionnaires for parents.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Participants&lt;/div&gt;A total of 6483 adolescents 13 to 18 years of age and their parents.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main Outcome Measures&lt;/div&gt;Lifetime suicide ideation, plans, and attempts.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;The estimated lifetime prevalences of suicide ideation, plans, and attempts among the respondents are 12.1%, 4.0%, and 4.1%, respectively. The vast majority of adolescents with these behaviors meet lifetime criteria for at least one DSM-IV mental disorder assessed in the survey. Most temporally primary (based on retrospective age-of-onset reports) fear/anger, distress, disruptive behavior, and substance disorders significantly predict elevated odds of subsequent suicidal behaviors in bivariate models. The most consistently significant associations of these disorders are with suicide ideation, although a number of disorders are also predictors of plans and both planned and unplanned attempts among ideators. Most suicidal adolescents (&gt;80%) receive some form of mental health treatment. In most cases (&gt;55%), treatment starts prior to onset of suicidal behaviors but fails to prevent these behaviors from occurring.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusions&lt;/div&gt;Suicidal behaviors are common among US adolescents, with rates that approach those of adults. The vast majority of youth with suicidal behaviors have preexisting mental disorders. The disorders most powerfully predicting ideation, though, are different from those most powerfully predicting conditional transitions from ideation to plans and attempts. These differences suggest that distinct prediction and prevention strategies are needed for ideation, plans among ideators, planned attempts, and unplanned attempts.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">70</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">3</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">300</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">310</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/2013.jamapsychiatry.55</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1555602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>