<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>JAMA Psychiatry: Child Abuse Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 21:44:22 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@archpsyc.jamanetwork.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@archpsyc.jamanetwork.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Disrupted Reinforcement Learning and Maladaptive Behavior in Women With a History of Childhood Sexual Abuse A High-Density Event-Related Potential Study  Disrupted Reinforcement Learning </title>
      <link>http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1666650</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Pechtel P, Pizzagalli DA. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Importance&lt;/div&gt;Childhood sexual abuse (CSA) has been associated with psychopathology, particularly major depressive disorder (MDD), and high-risk behaviors. Despite the epidemiological data available, the mechanisms underlying these maladaptive outcomes remain poorly understood.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective&lt;/div&gt;We examined whether a history of CSA, particularly in conjunction with a past episode of MDD, is associated with behavioral and neural dysfunction in reinforcement learning, and whether such dysfunction is linked to maladaptive behavior.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design&lt;/div&gt;Participants completed a clinical evaluation and a probabilistic reinforcement task while 128-channel event-related potentials were recorded.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting&lt;/div&gt;Academic setting; participants recruited from the community.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Participants&lt;/div&gt;Fifteen women with a history of CSA and remitted MDD (CSA + rMDD), 16 women with remitted MDD with no history of CSA (rMDD), and 18 healthy women (controls).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Exposure&lt;/div&gt;Three or more episodes of coerced sexual contact (mean [SD] duration, 3.00 [2.20] years) between the ages of 7 and 12 years by at least 1 male perpetrator.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main Outcomes and Measures&lt;/div&gt;Participants' preference for choosing the most rewarded stimulus and avoiding the most punished stimulus was evaluated. The feedback-related negativity and error-related negativity—hypothesized to reflect activation in the anterior cingulate cortex—were used as electrophysiological indices of reinforcement learning.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;No group differences emerged in the acquisition of reinforcement contingencies. In trials requiring participants to rely partially or exclusively on previously rewarded information, the CSA + rMDD group showed (1) lower accuracy (relative to both controls and the rMDD group), (2) blunted electrophysiological differentiation between correct and incorrect responses (relative to controls), and (3) increased activation in the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (relative to the rMDD group). A history of CSA was not associated with impairments in avoiding the most punished stimulus. Self-harm and suicidal behaviors correlated with poorer performance of previously rewarded, but not previously punished, trials.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusions and Relevance&lt;/div&gt;Irrespective of past MDD episodes, women with a history of CSA showed neural and behavioral deficits in utilizing previous reinforcement to optimize decision making in the absence of feedback (blunted “Go learning”). Although our study provides initial evidence for reward-specific deficits associated with CSA, future research is warranted to determine if disrupted positive reinforcement learning predicts high-risk behavior following CSA.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">70</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">5</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">499</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">507</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.728</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1666650</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Association of Maternal Exposure to Childhood Abuse With Elevated Risk for Autism in Offspring Autism and Maternal Exposure to Childhood Abuse </title>
      <link>http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1666655</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Roberts AL, Lyall K, Rich-Edwards JW, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Importance&lt;/div&gt;Adverse perinatal circumstances have been associated with increased risk for autism in offspring. Women exposed to childhood abuse experience more adverse perinatal circumstances than women unexposed, but whether maternal abuse is associated with autism in offspring is unknown.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objectives&lt;/div&gt;To determine whether maternal exposure to childhood abuse is associated with risk for autism in offspring and whether possible increased risk is accounted for by a higher prevalence of adverse perinatal circumstances among abused women, including toxemia, low birth weight, gestational diabetes, previous induced abortion, intimate partner abuse, pregnancy length shorter than 37 weeks, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use, and alcohol use and smoking during pregnancy.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design and Setting&lt;/div&gt;Nurses' Health Study II, a population-based longitudinal cohort of 116 430 women.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Participants&lt;/div&gt;Nurses with data on maternal childhood abuse and child's autism status (97.0% were of white race/ethnicity). Controls were randomly selected from among children of women who did not report autism in offspring (participants included 451 mothers of children with autism and 52 498 mothers of children without autism).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main Outcome Measures&lt;/div&gt;Autism spectrum disorder in offspring, assessed by maternal report and validated with the Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised in a subsample.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;Exposure to abuse was associated with increased risk for autism in children in a monotonically increasing fashion. The highest level of abuse was associated with the greatest prevalence of autism (1.8% vs 0.7% among women not abused, P = .005) and with the greatest risk for autism adjusted for demographic factors (risk ratio, 3.7; 95% CI, 2.3-5.8). All adverse perinatal circumstances except low birth weight were more prevalent among women abused in childhood. Adjusted for perinatal factors, the association of maternal childhood abuse with autism in offspring was slightly attenuated (risk ratio for highest level of abuse, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.9-4.8).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusions and Relevance&lt;/div&gt;We identify an intergenerational association between maternal exposure to childhood abuse and risk for autism in the subsequent generation. Adverse perinatal circumstances accounted for only a small portion of this increased risk.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">70</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">5</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">508</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">515</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.447</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1666655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>