<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>JAMA Psychiatry: Epilepsy Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:46:37 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@archpsyc.jamanetwork.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@archpsyc.jamanetwork.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>The Catatonia Syndrome Forgotten but Not Gone </title>
      <link>http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=210437</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Fink M, Taylor M. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;Catatonia is a motor dysregulation syndrome among psychiatric asylum patients that was delineated in 1874. The syndrome was so well characterized that within a few years its prevalence among psychiatric populations was reported from 6% to 38%, averaging 15% of hospitalized patients in the years since. In the mid–20th century, as psychiatric practice shifted from the asylum to the ambulatory clinic with an emphasis on psychotherapy and the prescription of psychotropic agents, the role of the medical examination was degraded and the recognition of catatonia languished. The perceived tight bond between catatonia and the diagnosis of schizophrenia led to the widespread assumption that catatonia is mainly a form of psychosis and is not appropriately classified elsewhere.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">66</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">11</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">1173</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">1177</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.141</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=210437</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Relationship Between Antiepileptic Drugs and Suicide Attempts in Patients With Bipolar Disorder Antiepileptics and Suicide Attempts in Bipolar Patients </title>
      <link>http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=210485</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Gibbons RD, Hur K, Brown C, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Context&lt;/div&gt;On January 31, 2008, the Food and Drug Administration issued an alert regarding increased risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior related to use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). On July 10, 2008, a Food and Drug Administration scientific advisory committee voted that, yes, there was a significant positive association between AEDs and suicidality but voted against placing a black box warning on AEDs for suicidality.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective&lt;/div&gt;To determine if AEDs increase the risk of suicide attempt in patients with bipolar disorder.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design&lt;/div&gt;A pharmacoepidemiologic study in which suicide attempt rates were compared before and after treatment and with a medication-free control group. Analyses were restricted to AED and lithium monotherapy.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting&lt;/div&gt;We used the PharMetrics medical claims database to study the relationship between the 11 AEDs identified in the FDA alert, and lithium, to suicide attempts.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main Outcome Measure&lt;/div&gt;Suicide attempts.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Patients&lt;/div&gt;A cohort of 47 918 patients with bipolar disorder with a minimum 1-year window of information before and after the index date of their illness.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;Overall, there was no significant difference in suicide attempt rates for patients treated with an AED (13 per 1000 person-years [PY]) vs patients not treated with an AED or lithium (13 per 1000 PY). In AED-treated subjects, the rate of suicide attempts was significantly higher before treatment (72 per 1000 PY) than after (13 per 1000 PY). In patients receiving no concomitant treatment with an antidepressant, other AED, or antipsychotic, AEDs were significantly protective relative to no pharmacologic treatment (3 per 1000 vs 15 per 1000 PY).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusions&lt;/div&gt;Despite Food and Drug Administration reports regarding increased risk of suicidality associated with AED treatment, the current study reveals that, as a class, AEDs do not increase risk of suicide attempts in patients with bipolar disorder relative to patients not treated with an AED or lithium. Use of AEDs reduces suicide attempt rates both relative to patients not receiving any psychotropic medication and relative to their pretreatment levels.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">66</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">12</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">1354</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">1360</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.159</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=210485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>